Wild Inside Itself: Circularity and Neo-liberal Critique in Marina Rosenfeld’s Deathstar Series

Abstract The work of Brooklyn-based sound artist Marina Rosenfeld (b. 1968) is shaped by repetition. Its repetitiveness does not necessarily materialise on the level of repeating musical notes or motifs – although such instances do occur – but operates on a more conceptual level: it repeats in the sense of the artist deliberately ‘going back’ to revisit archival materials. This article focuses on Rosenfeld’s Deathstar series (2017–) and uses repetition as its main heuristic tool. How, what, and why does this project repeat? And more importantly, how does its repetitiveness meaningfully confront the contemporary? Reading Deathstar alongside the work of contemporary thinkers such as Anna Kornbluh, Tim Ingold, Mark Fisher, and Rosi Braidotti allows the theorisation of its repetitive aesthetics as an act of neo-liberal critique; a means of sonically thinking through and providing alternatives to the many circular and loop-based dynamics that underpin the socioeconomic realities of the new millennium.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
twentieth-century music
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1478572225100273
Primary Topic
Sound Studies and Aurality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Wild Inside Itself: Circularity and Neo-liberal Critique in Marina Rosenfeld’s Deathstar Series

Christine Dysers
twentieth-century music
Sound Studies and Aurality
article

Wild Inside Itself: Circularity and Neo-liberal Critique in Marina Rosenfeld’s Deathstar Series

Christine Dysers
article en

Abstract

Abstract The work of Brooklyn-based sound artist Marina Rosenfeld (b. 1968) is shaped by repetition. Its repetitiveness does not necessarily materialise on the level of repeating musical notes or motifs – although such instances do occur – but operates on a more conceptual level: it repeats in the sense of the artist deliberately ‘going back’ to revisit archival materials. This article focuses on Rosenfeld’s Deathstar series (2017–) and uses repetition as its main heuristic tool. How, what, and why does this project repeat? And more importantly, how does its repetitiveness meaningfully confront the contemporary? Reading Deathstar alongside the work of contemporary thinkers such as Anna Kornbluh, Tim Ingold, Mark Fisher, and Rosi Braidotti allows the theorisation of its repetitive aesthetics as an act of neo-liberal critique; a means of sonically thinking through and providing alternatives to the many circular and loop-based dynamics that underpin the socioeconomic realities of the new millennium.

twentieth-century music
Uppsala University (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Sound Studies and Aurality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.