Enhancing the Seismic Resilience of Masonry‐Infilled RC Structures Using Rubber Joints: Full‐Scale 3D Shaking Table Tests

ABSTRACT Masonry infills in reinforced concrete (RC) frames are highly vulnerable to seismic damage, often sustaining severe cracking even under moderate ground motion, which in turn leads to considerable economic losses and safety risks. To address this issue, this study experimentally evaluates the effectiveness of two innovative rubber‐based joints developed to enhance the seismic performance of masonry infilled RC frames. Two identical RC frame prototypes with hollow clay brick infills were constructed and subjected to shake‐table tests with progressively increasing seismic inputs. The first model (M1) incorporated horizontal and vertical rubber joints designed to enhance the panel's flexibility and the system's energy dissipation capability. The second model (M2) utilized recycled‐rubber joints (INODIS) to achieve complete decoupling of the masonry infill from the RC frame, with the objective of eliminating infill participation in the structural response and streamlining the seismic design strategy. Both systems performed very well in minimizing infill damage under severe earthquakes. The M1 configuration was able to control both interstorey drifts and accelerations under very large seismic inputs, thanks to the additional stiffness and damping provided by the panel‐joint system. In contrast, the M2 configuration exhibited greater deformability, with the frame reaching high drift demands due to the isolation system that significantly reduced the panel's contribution to the global response. This work presents the first direct full‐scale experimental comparison of flexible and decoupling rubber joint strategies for seismic protection of masonry‐infilled RC frames, providing critical evidence to support future validations at building scale.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Published
2026-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.70296
Primary Topic
Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Enhancing the Seismic Resilience of Masonry‐Infilled RC Structures Using Rubber Joints: Full‐Scale 3D Shaking Table Tests

Daniele Losanno, Fabio Freddi, Vlatko Sheshov, Alessandro Lotti et al.
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
article

Enhancing the Seismic Resilience of Masonry‐Infilled RC Structures Using Rubber Joints: Full‐Scale 3D Shaking Table Tests

Daniele Losanno, Fabio Freddi, Vlatko Sheshov, Alessandro Lotti, Hamid Ahmadi, Enrico Tubaldi, Simone Galano, Prateek Kumar Dhir, Nemanja Krtinić, Christoph Butenweg, Matija Bošković, Zoran Rakicevic, F. Manojlovski, Marko Marinković, J. Bojadzieva, Matjia Gams, A. Bogdanovic
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Masonry infills in reinforced concrete (RC) frames are highly vulnerable to seismic damage, often sustaining severe cracking even under moderate ground motion, which in turn leads to considerable economic losses and safety risks. To address this issue, this study experimentally evaluates the effectiveness of two innovative rubber‐based joints developed to enhance the seismic performance of masonry infilled RC frames. Two identical RC frame prototypes with hollow clay brick infills were constructed and subjected to shake‐table tests with progressively increasing seismic inputs. The first model (M1) incorporated horizontal and vertical rubber joints designed to enhance the panel's flexibility and the system's energy dissipation capability. The second model (M2) utilized recycled‐rubber joints (INODIS) to achieve complete decoupling of the masonry infill from the RC frame, with the objective of eliminating infill participation in the structural response and streamlining the seismic design strategy. Both systems performed very well in minimizing infill damage under severe earthquakes. The M1 configuration was able to control both interstorey drifts and accelerations under very large seismic inputs, thanks to the additional stiffness and damping provided by the panel‐joint system. In contrast, the M2 configuration exhibited greater deformability, with the frame reaching high drift demands due to the isolation system that significantly reduced the panel's contribution to the global response. This work presents the first direct full‐scale experimental comparison of flexible and decoupling rubber joint strategies for seismic protection of masonry‐infilled RC frames, providing critical evidence to support future validations at building scale.

Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Tun Abdul Razak Research Centre (GB), University of Strathclyde (GB), Durham University (GB), University of Trento (IT), University of Belgrade (RS), Geodetic Institute of Slovenia (SI), University College London (GB), University of Naples Federico II (IT), Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje (MK), RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.