Loneliness at work: a cross-sectional study on prevalence and correlates in a representative sample of employees in Germany

Abstract Loneliness at work is increasingly recognized as a public health concern, yet population-representative data on its prevalence and correlates among employees remain scarce. The present cross-sectional study examines the prevalence of three facets of loneliness at work—perceived aloneness, perceived exclusion, and the feeling of loneliness—in employees in Germany and explores their sociodemographic and job-related correlates. Data comes from the third wave of the nationally representative Study on Mental Health at Work (S-MGA), collected in Germany in 2023/24. Employees aged 25–65 were included in the analyses ( N = 7,798). Loneliness was assessed using two items capturing perceived aloneness and perceived exclusion at work as well as one item directly assessing how often employees feel lonely at work. Correlates were age, gender, disability, skill level, leadership position, type of contract, working part-time vs. full-time, working from home as well as frequency of interactions with colleagues and frequency of interactions with customers and patients. Prevalence estimates were calculated using survey weights. Chi-square tests and multivariable logistic regressions were used to identify correlates. More than one in four employees in Germany (26.3%, 95% CI: 25.1–27.5) reported feeling alone at work, i.e., lacking companionship of colleagues at least sometimes. About 17% (16.9%, 15.9–18.0) reported feeling excluded and eight per cent (7.9%, 7.2–8.7) reported feeling lonely at work at least sometimes when asked directly. In multivariable logistic regression, less frequent contact with colleagues was related to feeling alone, feeling excluded and feeling lonely at work. Having a fixed-term contract was associated with higher odds of feeling excluded (OR = 1.39, 95% CI:1.04–1.86) and feeling lonely (OR = 1.46, 1.00-2.11). Being in a leadership position was associated with lower odds of feeling excluded at work (OR = 0.82, 0.68–0.99). Loneliness at work is common among German employees and varies across its facets. Modifiable workplace factors, particularly the frequency of collegial interaction, are associated with work-related loneliness. The findings suggest that prevention strategies should ensure sufficient opportunities for social interaction during working hours and pay particular attention to employees in fixed-term positions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-70101-8
Primary Topic
Workplace Health and Well-being
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Loneliness at work: a cross-sectional study on prevalence and correlates in a representative sample of employees in Germany

Hannah M. Schade, Andrea Lohmann-Haislah, Ina Schöllgen, Friederike Buchallik
Scientific Reports
Workplace Health and Well-being
article

Loneliness at work: a cross-sectional study on prevalence and correlates in a representative sample of employees in Germany

Hannah M. Schade, Andrea Lohmann-Haislah, Ina Schöllgen, Friederike Buchallik
article en

Abstract

Abstract Loneliness at work is increasingly recognized as a public health concern, yet population-representative data on its prevalence and correlates among employees remain scarce. The present cross-sectional study examines the prevalence of three facets of loneliness at work—perceived aloneness, perceived exclusion, and the feeling of loneliness—in employees in Germany and explores their sociodemographic and job-related correlates. Data comes from the third wave of the nationally representative Study on Mental Health at Work (S-MGA), collected in Germany in 2023/24. Employees aged 25–65 were included in the analyses ( N = 7,798). Loneliness was assessed using two items capturing perceived aloneness and perceived exclusion at work as well as one item directly assessing how often employees feel lonely at work. Correlates were age, gender, disability, skill level, leadership position, type of contract, working part-time vs. full-time, working from home as well as frequency of interactions with colleagues and frequency of interactions with customers and patients. Prevalence estimates were calculated using survey weights. Chi-square tests and multivariable logistic regressions were used to identify correlates. More than one in four employees in Germany (26.3%, 95% CI: 25.1–27.5) reported feeling alone at work, i.e., lacking companionship of colleagues at least sometimes. About 17% (16.9%, 15.9–18.0) reported feeling excluded and eight per cent (7.9%, 7.2–8.7) reported feeling lonely at work at least sometimes when asked directly. In multivariable logistic regression, less frequent contact with colleagues was related to feeling alone, feeling excluded and feeling lonely at work. Having a fixed-term contract was associated with higher odds of feeling excluded (OR = 1.39, 95% CI:1.04–1.86) and feeling lonely (OR = 1.46, 1.00-2.11). Being in a leadership position was associated with lower odds of feeling excluded at work (OR = 0.82, 0.68–0.99). Loneliness at work is common among German employees and varies across its facets. Modifiable workplace factors, particularly the frequency of collegial interaction, are associated with work-related loneliness. The findings suggest that prevention strategies should ensure sufficient opportunities for social interaction during working hours and pay particular attention to employees in fixed-term positions.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
TU Dortmund University (DE), Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors (DE), Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (DE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Workplace Health and Well-being
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.