Licensure Without Oversight: Impact of Regulatory Supervision on Traditional Medicine Practice in Ghana

Introduction: Regulatory frameworks for traditional and alternative medicine commonly emphasize licensure as a mechanism for ensuring safety, quality, and sustainability. However, limited evidence exists on whether licensure without ongoing oversight meaningfully regulates practitioner conduct or promotes sustainable practices. This study examined the relationship between licensure, regulatory supervision, compliance, and sustainability-related practices among traditional medicine practitioners (TMPs). Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 303 TMPs. Data were collected on sociodemographic characteristics, licensing status, regulatory supervision, compliance with regulatory schemes, sources of raw materials, and cultivation practices. Associations were assessed using chi-square tests. The study is reported in accordance with Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. Results: While licensed practitioners were significantly more likely to report regulatory supervision than unlicensed practitioners (χ 2 = 39.64, p < 0.001), half of licensed practitioners had never experienced supervision. Overall compliance with regulatory schemes was low (12.2%) and was not significantly associated with perceived regulatory performance (χ 2 = 0.53, p = 0.465). Most practitioners relied on wild harvesting for raw materials (65.0%), with limited engagement in self-cultivation (17.2%) or intention to cultivate in the future (25.7%). Neither licensure nor supervision was significantly associated with adoption of cultivation practices. Discussion: The findings suggest that licensure without sustained supervision regulates entry into practice but does not effectively regulate conduct, compliance, or sustainability. Strengthening postlicensure oversight and integrating sustainability-focused regulatory mechanisms may be essential for achieving meaningful regulation of traditional medicine practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/27683605261488964
Primary Topic
Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Licensure Without Oversight: Impact of Regulatory Supervision on Traditional Medicine Practice in Ghana

Kofi Busia, Rudolph Mensah, Benedict Owusu Yankyera
Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine
Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
article

Licensure Without Oversight: Impact of Regulatory Supervision on Traditional Medicine Practice in Ghana

Kofi Busia, Rudolph Mensah, Benedict Owusu Yankyera
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Regulatory frameworks for traditional and alternative medicine commonly emphasize licensure as a mechanism for ensuring safety, quality, and sustainability. However, limited evidence exists on whether licensure without ongoing oversight meaningfully regulates practitioner conduct or promotes sustainable practices. This study examined the relationship between licensure, regulatory supervision, compliance, and sustainability-related practices among traditional medicine practitioners (TMPs). Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 303 TMPs. Data were collected on sociodemographic characteristics, licensing status, regulatory supervision, compliance with regulatory schemes, sources of raw materials, and cultivation practices. Associations were assessed using chi-square tests. The study is reported in accordance with Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. Results: While licensed practitioners were significantly more likely to report regulatory supervision than unlicensed practitioners (χ 2 = 39.64, p < 0.001), half of licensed practitioners had never experienced supervision. Overall compliance with regulatory schemes was low (12.2%) and was not significantly associated with perceived regulatory performance (χ 2 = 0.53, p = 0.465). Most practitioners relied on wild harvesting for raw materials (65.0%), with limited engagement in self-cultivation (17.2%) or intention to cultivate in the future (25.7%). Neither licensure nor supervision was significantly associated with adoption of cultivation practices. Discussion: The findings suggest that licensure without sustained supervision regulates entry into practice but does not effectively regulate conduct, compliance, or sustainability. Strengthening postlicensure oversight and integrating sustainability-focused regulatory mechanisms may be essential for achieving meaningful regulation of traditional medicine practice.

Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine
Ministry of Health (GH), Lincoln University College (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.