Who worked from home after the pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic triggered a significant and long-lasting increase in the proportion of employees working from home (WFH). However, relatively little is known about the specific groups of workers that are most likely to work from home post-pandemic. This article investigates the characteristics of employees and their employers who are WFH in post-pandemic Australia. We run logistic regression analyses based on the 2023 round of the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey, which contains novel information on the number of full workdays worked from home. Sixteen hypotheses are proposed and tested. The results confirm strong and powerful associations between WFH full days and both occupation and industry. However, contrary to expectations, WFH is not positively associated with caring responsibilities or the presence of long-term health conditions or disabilities, nor is WFH more common among the oldest workers. This latter set of findings is striking given that the National Employment Standards identify these employee characteristics as deserving priority when employers consider requests to work from home. Overall, while worker preferences are relevant, the results suggest that it is the nature of jobs that is the main factor determining who has the option to work from home.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Industrial Relations
Published
2026-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00221856261489926
Primary Topic
Work-Family Balance Challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Who worked from home after the pandemic

Mark Wooden, Inga Laß
Journal of Industrial Relations
Work-Family Balance Challenges
article

Who worked from home after the pandemic

Mark Wooden, Inga Laß
article en

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic triggered a significant and long-lasting increase in the proportion of employees working from home (WFH). However, relatively little is known about the specific groups of workers that are most likely to work from home post-pandemic. This article investigates the characteristics of employees and their employers who are WFH in post-pandemic Australia. We run logistic regression analyses based on the 2023 round of the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey, which contains novel information on the number of full workdays worked from home. Sixteen hypotheses are proposed and tested. The results confirm strong and powerful associations between WFH full days and both occupation and industry. However, contrary to expectations, WFH is not positively associated with caring responsibilities or the presence of long-term health conditions or disabilities, nor is WFH more common among the oldest workers. This latter set of findings is striking given that the National Employment Standards identify these employee characteristics as deserving priority when employers consider requests to work from home. Overall, while worker preferences are relevant, the results suggest that it is the nature of jobs that is the main factor determining who has the option to work from home.

Journal of Industrial Relations
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Work-Family Balance Challenges
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Who worked from home after the pandemic — Mark Wooden, Inga Laß · Journal of Industrial Relations (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS