Variability in invasive mechanical ventilation education across two European paediatric intensive care training systems

Abstract Background Invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) is central to paediatric intensive care practice; however, training structures vary across Europe. Although initiatives led by the European Society of Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC), including its MV course, aim to address knowledge gaps and inconsistencies in training, disparities in educational exposure persist, and contemporary data on MV education are limited. Methods A cross-sectional anonymous electronic survey assessing knowledge of MV was developed by two members of the ESPNIC MV faculty. Eligible participants were medical doctors in training working in paediatric intensive care units (PICUs) in the United Kingdom (UK) and Spain between January and March 2025. The questionnaire evaluated self-reported knowledge, objective understanding of key ventilatory concepts, and educational exposure. The primary outcome was the perceived sufficiency of MV education among respondents from the UK and Spain. Secondary outcomes included exposure to MV education, applicability of MV training to clinical practice, and the attitudes towards standardisation of MV training within paediatric critical care education. Data were analysed descriptively. Results A total of 104 PICU doctors in training responded (UK, n = 39; Spain, n = 65). Denominators included non-responses per item. Among respondents, 10% (4/39) in the UK reported sufficient MV training, compared with 31% (20/65) in Spain. Attendance at formal MV teaching was reported by 54% (21/39) of UK respondents and 77% (50/65) of Spanish respondents. Suggested improvements to MV education included structured curriculum-integrated teaching, protected teaching time, simulation-based training, and improved access to funded courses. Conclusions Considerable variability exists in MV education across both training systems, with persistent gaps in understanding of fundamental ventilatory concepts. This is reflected in the low levels of perceived sufficiency of MV training among PICU doctors in both the UK and Spain. Standardised, curriculum-integrated MV training incorporating simulation-based learning may improve both competence and confidence in paediatric ventilatory care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Intensive Care Medicine – Paediatric and Neonatal
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44253-026-00139-z
Primary Topic
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Variability in invasive mechanical ventilation education across two European paediatric intensive care training systems

Sofia Cuevas‐Asturias, Juan Ramon Valle Ortiz, Reinout J. Mildner, Ciara O'Regan et al.
Intensive Care Medicine – Paediatric and Neonatal
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
article

Variability in invasive mechanical ventilation education across two European paediatric intensive care training systems

Sofia Cuevas‐Asturias, Juan Ramon Valle Ortiz, Reinout J. Mildner, Ciara O'Regan, Vicent Modesto-i-Alapont, Yolanda M. Lopez Fernandez, Janapriya Sugumar, Matthew Christopherson, Alberto Medina
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) is central to paediatric intensive care practice; however, training structures vary across Europe. Although initiatives led by the European Society of Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC), including its MV course, aim to address knowledge gaps and inconsistencies in training, disparities in educational exposure persist, and contemporary data on MV education are limited. Methods A cross-sectional anonymous electronic survey assessing knowledge of MV was developed by two members of the ESPNIC MV faculty. Eligible participants were medical doctors in training working in paediatric intensive care units (PICUs) in the United Kingdom (UK) and Spain between January and March 2025. The questionnaire evaluated self-reported knowledge, objective understanding of key ventilatory concepts, and educational exposure. The primary outcome was the perceived sufficiency of MV education among respondents from the UK and Spain. Secondary outcomes included exposure to MV education, applicability of MV training to clinical practice, and the attitudes towards standardisation of MV training within paediatric critical care education. Data were analysed descriptively. Results A total of 104 PICU doctors in training responded (UK, n = 39; Spain, n = 65). Denominators included non-responses per item. Among respondents, 10% (4/39) in the UK reported sufficient MV training, compared with 31% (20/65) in Spain. Attendance at formal MV teaching was reported by 54% (21/39) of UK respondents and 77% (50/65) of Spanish respondents. Suggested improvements to MV education included structured curriculum-integrated teaching, protected teaching time, simulation-based training, and improved access to funded courses. Conclusions Considerable variability exists in MV education across both training systems, with persistent gaps in understanding of fundamental ventilatory concepts. This is reflected in the low levels of perceived sufficiency of MV training among PICU doctors in both the UK and Spain. Standardised, curriculum-integrated MV training incorporating simulation-based learning may improve both competence and confidence in paediatric ventilatory care.

Intensive Care Medicine – Paediatric and Neonatal
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (GB), Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Bristol Royal Hospital for Children (GB), Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe (ES), BioCruces Health research Institute (ES), Birmingham Children's Hospital (GB), Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias (ES), Royal Manchester Children's Hospital (GB), Imperial College London (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.