Acoustic comfort in university environments: A literature review

Acoustic comfort in university environments is crucial for speech communication, learning, concentration, and inclusive participation. This systematic review examines acoustic conditions across diverse university campus spaces with different functional requirements. A structured evidence matrix was used to collect bibliographic data, spatial characteristics, room typologies, objective acoustic parameters, and subjective comfort indicators. The final dataset comprised 34 studies published between 2000 and 2026, covering 189 rooms. Research output increased significantly after 2018, with classrooms and lecture halls representing the most investigated settings. Reverberation time and background noise were the most frequently reported parameters, appearing in 74% and 68% of studies, respectively, whereas speech intelligibility was assessed less consistently. Longer reverberation times were associated with lower STI values, while larger room volumes and seating capacities generally corresponded to greater reverberation. Subjective evaluations appeared in 44.1% of studies and linked higher comfort to lower noise and reverberation, and better speech intelligibility across university settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Building Acoustics
Published
2026-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/1351010x261479045
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Acoustic comfort in university environments: A literature review

Francesco Asdrubali, Chiara Chiatti, Leone Barbaro
Building Acoustics
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
article

Acoustic comfort in university environments: A literature review

Francesco Asdrubali, Chiara Chiatti, Leone Barbaro
article en

Abstract

Acoustic comfort in university environments is crucial for speech communication, learning, concentration, and inclusive participation. This systematic review examines acoustic conditions across diverse university campus spaces with different functional requirements. A structured evidence matrix was used to collect bibliographic data, spatial characteristics, room typologies, objective acoustic parameters, and subjective comfort indicators. The final dataset comprised 34 studies published between 2000 and 2026, covering 189 rooms. Research output increased significantly after 2018, with classrooms and lecture halls representing the most investigated settings. Reverberation time and background noise were the most frequently reported parameters, appearing in 74% and 68% of studies, respectively, whereas speech intelligibility was assessed less consistently. Longer reverberation times were associated with lower STI values, while larger room volumes and seating capacities generally corresponded to greater reverberation. Subjective evaluations appeared in 44.1% of studies and linked higher comfort to lower noise and reverberation, and better speech intelligibility across university settings.

Building Acoustics
University for Foreigners Perugia (IT)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Acoustic comfort in university environments: A literature review — Francesco Asdrubali, Chiara Chiatti, et al. · Building Acoustics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS