Feasibility, acceptability, and impacts of a drug checking service within a supervised consumption site in Sydney, Australia

Background Research on drug checking services co-located within supervised consumption sites is limited. This multi-method study investigated the feasibility, acceptability and impacts of operating drug checking within the Uniting Medically Supervised Injecting Centre (MSIC), Sydney, Australia. Methods Feasibility was assessed using documentation of approval processes and requirements, on-site chemical analysis, and off-site confirmatory testing. Acceptability was measured using client uptake rate and surveys. Impact was assessed via self-reported intended behaviours captured through surveys and case notes. Results Following delays related to insurance, during 6 months in 2024, 65 people (74% male, median age 45 years) used the drug checking service, comprising 25% of the 256 MSIC clients on-site during drug checking service operation. On-site testing found that 61 of 77 samples contained only the expected substance, 11 contained the expected substance plus additional substance/s and 5 contained only unexpected substance/s. In seven samples, on-site results differed from off-site confirmatory analysis. For most samples (79%), participants reported having tried some of the batch prior to testing. While participants reported not having any more left following testing for 24% of the samples, for two thirds (68%) participants reported that they intended to use the drugs, including 5 who would use less and 6 who would carry naloxone. Almost half of participants (42%) sought further information about drug treatment and 20% were directly referred on. Conclusion These findings provide groundwork for the implementation of future drug checking services that are considered acceptable, trustworthy, and responsive to the needs of people who inject drugs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Drug Policy
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2026.105481
Primary Topic
Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Feasibility, acceptability, and impacts of a drug checking service within a supervised consumption site in Sydney, Australia

Suzanne Nielsen, Cameron Francis, Richard C. Kevin, Robert Page et al.
International Journal of Drug Policy
Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
article

Feasibility, acceptability, and impacts of a drug checking service within a supervised consumption site in Sydney, Australia

Suzanne Nielsen, Cameron Francis, Richard C. Kevin, Robert Page, Una Cullinan, Michala Kowalski, Monica Jane Barratt, Cheneal Puljević, Alison Ritter, Megan Moses, Kevin Street, Fiona Measham, Mark Bartlett, Marianne Jauncey
article en

Abstract

Background Research on drug checking services co-located within supervised consumption sites is limited. This multi-method study investigated the feasibility, acceptability and impacts of operating drug checking within the Uniting Medically Supervised Injecting Centre (MSIC), Sydney, Australia. Methods Feasibility was assessed using documentation of approval processes and requirements, on-site chemical analysis, and off-site confirmatory testing. Acceptability was measured using client uptake rate and surveys. Impact was assessed via self-reported intended behaviours captured through surveys and case notes. Results Following delays related to insurance, during 6 months in 2024, 65 people (74% male, median age 45 years) used the drug checking service, comprising 25% of the 256 MSIC clients on-site during drug checking service operation. On-site testing found that 61 of 77 samples contained only the expected substance, 11 contained the expected substance plus additional substance/s and 5 contained only unexpected substance/s. In seven samples, on-site results differed from off-site confirmatory analysis. For most samples (79%), participants reported having tried some of the batch prior to testing. While participants reported not having any more left following testing for 24% of the samples, for two thirds (68%) participants reported that they intended to use the drugs, including 5 who would use less and 6 who would carry naloxone. Almost half of participants (42%) sought further information about drug treatment and 20% were directly referred on. Conclusion These findings provide groundwork for the implementation of future drug checking services that are considered acceptable, trustworthy, and responsive to the needs of people who inject drugs.

International Journal of Drug PolicyVol. 157
New South Wales Department of Health (AU), Burnet Institute (AU), University of Liverpool (GB), The University of Queensland (AU), Curtin University (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), St Vincent's Hospital Sydney (AU), Monash Health (AU), South Eastern Sydney Local Health District (AU), National Drug Research Institute (AU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.