When caring depletes: the paradox of leading employee wellbeing during a prolonged crisis – evidence from the Australian resources sector

Purpose The protracted COVID-19 crisis placed substantial demands on managers in the Australian resources industry. While workers' wellbeing received increased attention during this period, much less is known about how managers sustained their own wellbeing while providing care, reassurance, and operational continuity. Drawing on the JD–R model, paradox theory, and moral strain perspectives, we examine wellbeing-oriented leadership during a sustained crisis. We focus on how leadership behaviour operated as both a resource for employees and a demand on managers, shaping their own wellbeing experiences and leadership identity. Design/methodology/approach An interpretative phenomenological approach (IPA) was employed. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 32 managers in the Australian mining, oil, and gas sector. The interview accounts were analysed using IPA to examine how participants made sense of responsibility, care, and uncertainty during a prolonged crisis. Findings The findings indicate that leadership during a prolonged crisis embodied a Demand–Resource Paradox (DRP). Practices such as emotional support, constant availability, and responsibility for safety and wellbeing decisions acted as resources for employees while imposing demands on managers. Sustained over time, these practices contributed to the accumulation of psychological strain and resource depletion. Originality/value First, we extend JD–R theory by identifying a Demand–Resource Paradox in which wellbeing-oriented leadership supports workers while depleting managers. Second, we advance moral strain research by showing how moral strain accumulates through prolonged crisis-related responsibility. Third, we reconceptualise crisis leadership as an endurance-based process, distinct from resilience models, by emphasising chronic demands, cumulative depletion, identity reshaping, and the absence of clear recovery periods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Leadership & Organization Development Journal
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/lodj-01-2026-0060
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Safety Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

When caring depletes: the paradox of leading employee wellbeing during a prolonged crisis – evidence from the Australian resources sector

Michael Mayom Ajith, Andrei Alexander Lux, Michelle Striepe, Tim Bentley
Leadership & Organization Development Journal
Occupational Health and Safety Research
article

When caring depletes: the paradox of leading employee wellbeing during a prolonged crisis – evidence from the Australian resources sector

Michael Mayom Ajith, Andrei Alexander Lux, Michelle Striepe, Tim Bentley
article en

Abstract

Purpose The protracted COVID-19 crisis placed substantial demands on managers in the Australian resources industry. While workers' wellbeing received increased attention during this period, much less is known about how managers sustained their own wellbeing while providing care, reassurance, and operational continuity. Drawing on the JD–R model, paradox theory, and moral strain perspectives, we examine wellbeing-oriented leadership during a sustained crisis. We focus on how leadership behaviour operated as both a resource for employees and a demand on managers, shaping their own wellbeing experiences and leadership identity. Design/methodology/approach An interpretative phenomenological approach (IPA) was employed. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 32 managers in the Australian mining, oil, and gas sector. The interview accounts were analysed using IPA to examine how participants made sense of responsibility, care, and uncertainty during a prolonged crisis. Findings The findings indicate that leadership during a prolonged crisis embodied a Demand–Resource Paradox (DRP). Practices such as emotional support, constant availability, and responsibility for safety and wellbeing decisions acted as resources for employees while imposing demands on managers. Sustained over time, these practices contributed to the accumulation of psychological strain and resource depletion. Originality/value First, we extend JD–R theory by identifying a Demand–Resource Paradox in which wellbeing-oriented leadership supports workers while depleting managers. Second, we advance moral strain research by showing how moral strain accumulates through prolonged crisis-related responsibility. Third, we reconceptualise crisis leadership as an endurance-based process, distinct from resilience models, by emphasising chronic demands, cumulative depletion, identity reshaping, and the absence of clear recovery periods.

Leadership & Organization Development JournalVol. 47(9)
Edith Cowan University (AU)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Occupational Health and Safety Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.