A Review of Large Language Models (LLMs) for Surgical Training and Evaluations of Performance

This review examines large language models (LLMs) in surgical training, education, and performance evaluation. A literature search across PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and IEEE Xplore identified 23 relevant studies from 1,159 records. The review shows that LLMs can support surgical knowledge assessment, procedural reasoning, intraoperative decision-making, postoperative feedback, patient communication, and simulation-based education. Despite this, important limitations remain, including hallucinations, privacy risks, bias, and inconsistent clinical reliability. Future research may investigate multi-institutional studies, standardized benchmarks, multimodal integration, and rigorous evaluation of safety in surgical training.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813261485946
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

A Review of Large Language Models (LLMs) for Surgical Training and Evaluations of Performance

Haozhi Chen, Jingkun Wang, Gaoyuan Tu, Aqib Abdullah et al.
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

A Review of Large Language Models (LLMs) for Surgical Training and Evaluations of Performance

Haozhi Chen, Jingkun Wang, Gaoyuan Tu, Aqib Abdullah, Peiran Liu, Che Liu
article en

Abstract

This review examines large language models (LLMs) in surgical training, education, and performance evaluation. A literature search across PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and IEEE Xplore identified 23 relevant studies from 1,159 records. The review shows that LLMs can support surgical knowledge assessment, procedural reasoning, intraoperative decision-making, postoperative feedback, patient communication, and simulation-based education. Despite this, important limitations remain, including hallucinations, privacy risks, bias, and inconsistent clinical reliability. Future research may investigate multi-institutional studies, standardized benchmarks, multimodal integration, and rigorous evaluation of safety in surgical training.

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Review of Large Language Models (LLMs) for Surgical Training and Evaluations of Performance — Haozhi Chen, Jingkun Wang, et al. · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS