Fractured lenses: A framing analysis of Sudan’s civil war in Pan-Arab media

This study examines how three major pan-Arab media outlets—Al Jazeera Arabic, Al Arabiya, and Sky News Arabia—framed the Sudan War during its first year (April 15, 2023–April 15, 2024). Using an inductive research design, the study draws on a quantitative content analysis of 300 news articles collected through an archival search of the outlets’ official websites. The analysis focuses on identifying dominant news frames, sourcing patterns, and tone toward the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF). Rather than testing predetermined hypotheses, the study seeks to determine how framing strategies emerge across the three outlets. The findings reveal clear variations in framing, particularly in source selection and the emphasis on conflict, responsibility, and geopolitical narratives. The study contributes to the limited literature on Arab media coverage of African conflicts and highlights how online news platforms shape representations of contemporary conflicts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Media War & Conflict
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17506352261484725
Primary Topic
Media Studies and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Fractured lenses: A framing analysis of Sudan’s civil war in Pan-Arab media

Oussama Badad, Omar Kouiyache
Media War & Conflict
Media Studies and Communication
article

Fractured lenses: A framing analysis of Sudan’s civil war in Pan-Arab media

Oussama Badad, Omar Kouiyache
article en

Abstract

This study examines how three major pan-Arab media outlets—Al Jazeera Arabic, Al Arabiya, and Sky News Arabia—framed the Sudan War during its first year (April 15, 2023–April 15, 2024). Using an inductive research design, the study draws on a quantitative content analysis of 300 news articles collected through an archival search of the outlets’ official websites. The analysis focuses on identifying dominant news frames, sourcing patterns, and tone toward the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF). Rather than testing predetermined hypotheses, the study seeks to determine how framing strategies emerge across the three outlets. The findings reveal clear variations in framing, particularly in source selection and the emphasis on conflict, responsibility, and geopolitical narratives. The study contributes to the limited literature on Arab media coverage of African conflicts and highlights how online news platforms shape representations of contemporary conflicts.

Media War & Conflict
University of Ottawa (CA), Abdelmalek Essaâdi University (MA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Media Studies and Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Fractured lenses: A framing analysis of Sudan’s civil war in Pan-Arab media — Oussama Badad, Omar Kouiyache · Media War & Conflict (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS