Safety and Efficacy of Ceralasertib plus Olaparib for Advanced/Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in Three Molecular Strata: The Phase II VIOLETTE Study

PURPOSE: VIOLETTE (NCT03330847) assessed olaparib alone or with ceralasertib (ATR inhibitor) or adavosertib (WEE1 inhibitor) as second-/third-line treatment in three molecular strata of patients with previously treated, PARP inhibitor-naïve, advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to olaparib 300 mg twice daily (BD), ceralasertib 160 mg once daily (Days 1-7; 28-day cycles) + olaparib 300 mg BD, or adavosertib 150 mg BD (Days 1-3, 8-10; 21-day cycles) + olaparib 200 mg BD. Patients were stratified by presence of tumoral homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway mutations (m): BRCA1/2m, non-BRCA1/2m HRRm, or non-HRRm. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review. RESULTS: 273 patients were randomized: 114, 112, and 47 to the olaparib, ceralasertib + olaparib, and adavosertib + olaparib arms, respectively. The adavosertib + olaparib arm was terminated early due to unacceptable toxicity. Median PFS of ceralasertib + olaparib was 7.4, 3.9, and 3.6 months in the BRCA1/2m, non-BRCA1/2m HRRm, and non-HRRm strata, respectively, and did not differ significantly from olaparib (HR 1.02 [90% CI, 0.63-1.66], 0.54 [90% CI, 0.28-1.03], and 0.76 [90% CI, 0.50-1.14], respectively). In the non-HRRm group objective response rates (ORR) were significantly improved for ceralasertib + olaparib (15.4%) vs. olaparib (3.9%; OR, 4.45; 90% CI, 1.30‒21.20; P = 0.0425). No unexpected safety signals were reported for ceralasertib or olaparib. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with advanced PARP inhibitor-naïve non-HRRm TNBC, ceralasertib + olaparib significantly improved ORR versus olaparib. However, clinical significance is limited without improvement in PFS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-26-1066
Primary Topic
PARP inhibition in cancer therapy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Safety and Efficacy of Ceralasertib plus Olaparib for Advanced/Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in Three Molecular Strata: The Phase II VIOLETTE Study

Emma Jane Dean, Hendrik‐Tobias Arkenau, Moritz Drachsler, Renata Szoszkiewicz et al.
Clinical Cancer Research
PARP inhibition in cancer therapy
article

Safety and Efficacy of Ceralasertib plus Olaparib for Advanced/Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in Three Molecular Strata: The Phase II VIOLETTE Study

Emma Jane Dean, Hendrik‐Tobias Arkenau, Moritz Drachsler, Renata Szoszkiewicz, Natalia Lukashchuk, Kevin Punie, William Jacot, Anne Caroline Armstrong, Zbigniew Ireneusz Nowecki, Seock‐Ah Im, Ed Casson, Suzette Delaloge, Judith Balmañà, Andrew N.J. Tutt, Jee Hyun Kim, Arsène‐Bienvenu Loembé, Ronny Odegbami, Marc Webster
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: VIOLETTE (NCT03330847) assessed olaparib alone or with ceralasertib (ATR inhibitor) or adavosertib (WEE1 inhibitor) as second-/third-line treatment in three molecular strata of patients with previously treated, PARP inhibitor-naïve, advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to olaparib 300 mg twice daily (BD), ceralasertib 160 mg once daily (Days 1-7; 28-day cycles) + olaparib 300 mg BD, or adavosertib 150 mg BD (Days 1-3, 8-10; 21-day cycles) + olaparib 200 mg BD. Patients were stratified by presence of tumoral homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway mutations (m): BRCA1/2m, non-BRCA1/2m HRRm, or non-HRRm. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review. RESULTS: 273 patients were randomized: 114, 112, and 47 to the olaparib, ceralasertib + olaparib, and adavosertib + olaparib arms, respectively. The adavosertib + olaparib arm was terminated early due to unacceptable toxicity. Median PFS of ceralasertib + olaparib was 7.4, 3.9, and 3.6 months in the BRCA1/2m, non-BRCA1/2m HRRm, and non-HRRm strata, respectively, and did not differ significantly from olaparib (HR 1.02 [90% CI, 0.63-1.66], 0.54 [90% CI, 0.28-1.03], and 0.76 [90% CI, 0.50-1.14], respectively). In the non-HRRm group objective response rates (ORR) were significantly improved for ceralasertib + olaparib (15.4%) vs. olaparib (3.9%; OR, 4.45; 90% CI, 1.30‒21.20; P = 0.0425). No unexpected safety signals were reported for ceralasertib or olaparib. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with advanced PARP inhibitor-naïve non-HRRm TNBC, ceralasertib + olaparib significantly improved ORR versus olaparib. However, clinical significance is limited without improvement in PFS.

Clinical Cancer Research
Institute of Cancer Research (GB), Sarah Cannon Research Institute (GB), Institut Gustave Roussy (FR), Seoul National University Hospital (KR), Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (KR), Institute of Cancer Research (CA), AstraZeneca (Singapore) (SG), National Institute of Oncology (HU), Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari (ES), The Christie NHS Foundation Trust (GB), AstraZeneca (Poland) (PL), Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (FR), CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence (GB), The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology (PL), KU Leuven (BE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
PARP inhibition in cancer therapy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Safety and Efficacy of Ceralasertib plus Olaparib for Advanced/Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in Three Molecular Strata: The Phase II VIOLETTE Study — Emma Jane Dean, Hendrik‐Tobias Arkenau, et al. · Clinical Cancer Research (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS