CLINICAL APPLICATIONS OF POLYGENIC SCORES: OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES

Polygenic scores (PGS) are arguably the best-substantiated biomarkers of risk available in psychiatry. In light of this, there is growing interest in their potential for informing clinical practice. However, prospects for the clinical translation of PGS face a number of formidable challenges including their limited predictive value, the Eurocentric bias of existing genomic data, ascertainment bias in training data, and the complex ethical, legal and social issues their use might raise. Beyond these, the complexities of real-world implementation have been under-explored. This presentation will review these issues, drawing on a variety of recent studies including the experience of the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Network which has been returning PGS in clinical practice for a range of common diseases across multiple U.S. health systems. We will also discuss the need for establishing performance metrics, factors bearing on the selection of viable use cases in psychiatry and the potential for enhancing risk prediction by integrating PGS with clinical risk models. The so-called “last mile” of translating prediction models into clinical practice is an arduous and complex process. An implementation science framework will be essential if the development and validation of PGS are to be more than an academic exercise.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2026.112954
Primary Topic
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

CLINICAL APPLICATIONS OF POLYGENIC SCORES: OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES

Jordan Smoller
European Neuropsychopharmacology
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
article

CLINICAL APPLICATIONS OF POLYGENIC SCORES: OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES

Jordan Smoller
article en

Abstract

Polygenic scores (PGS) are arguably the best-substantiated biomarkers of risk available in psychiatry. In light of this, there is growing interest in their potential for informing clinical practice. However, prospects for the clinical translation of PGS face a number of formidable challenges including their limited predictive value, the Eurocentric bias of existing genomic data, ascertainment bias in training data, and the complex ethical, legal and social issues their use might raise. Beyond these, the complexities of real-world implementation have been under-explored. This presentation will review these issues, drawing on a variety of recent studies including the experience of the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Network which has been returning PGS in clinical practice for a range of common diseases across multiple U.S. health systems. We will also discuss the need for establishing performance metrics, factors bearing on the selection of viable use cases in psychiatry and the potential for enhancing risk prediction by integrating PGS with clinical risk models. The so-called “last mile” of translating prediction models into clinical practice is an arduous and complex process. An implementation science framework will be essential if the development and validation of PGS are to be more than an academic exercise.

European NeuropsychopharmacologyVol. 111
Harvard University (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.