Resistance, Reform, and Reimagination: Responding to Coloniality Through Secondary English Curricula

In settler colonial contexts, education remains entangled with the imperial project. Grappling with the work of reconciliation and redress, education authorities have begun rewriting curricula to respond to the colonial inheritance in subject English. In this paper, we read three official secondary English curricula – from Aotearoa New Zealand, Australia, and Ontario, Canada – asking how each has responded to coloniality. Across these documents we identify three approaches to redress: resistance to erasure, reformation of curricular structures, and reimagination of what constitutes subject English. Each pathway opens possibilities for anticolonial practice while simultaneously leaving in place structures through which English continues to reinscribe colonial norms. We offer this reading as a model teachers can apply to the institutional curriculum documents of their own context. Prompts throughout the paper guide that reading and support the movement towards anticolonial practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Changing English
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/1358684x.2026.2726967
Primary Topic
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Resistance, Reform, and Reimagination: Responding to Coloniality Through Secondary English Curricula

Larissa McLean Davies, Troy Potter, Grace Elkins
Changing English
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
article

Resistance, Reform, and Reimagination: Responding to Coloniality Through Secondary English Curricula

Larissa McLean Davies, Troy Potter, Grace Elkins
article en

Abstract

In settler colonial contexts, education remains entangled with the imperial project. Grappling with the work of reconciliation and redress, education authorities have begun rewriting curricula to respond to the colonial inheritance in subject English. In this paper, we read three official secondary English curricula – from Aotearoa New Zealand, Australia, and Ontario, Canada – asking how each has responded to coloniality. Across these documents we identify three approaches to redress: resistance to erasure, reformation of curricular structures, and reimagination of what constitutes subject English. Each pathway opens possibilities for anticolonial practice while simultaneously leaving in place structures through which English continues to reinscribe colonial norms. We offer this reading as a model teachers can apply to the institutional curriculum documents of their own context. Prompts throughout the paper guide that reading and support the movement towards anticolonial practice.

Changing English
The University of Melbourne (AU), Australian Catholic University (AU)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Resistance, Reform, and Reimagination: Responding to Coloniality Through Secondary English Curricula — Larissa McLean Davies, Troy Potter, et al. · Changing English (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS