AI and book indexing: trajectory data

While artificial intelligence (AI) can be a highly useful tool in some situations and with some highly defined problem spaces, book indexing does not appear to be one of them. This paper supplements our previously published white papers by comparing the effectiveness of large language model AI chatbots, across multiple generations, at indexing a book or book chapter. Our earlier white papers indicated that AI-generated indexes fail to reflect subtopics and related topics, preventing readers from having appropriate access to all indexable material; that AIs under-index, failing to pick up on significantly discussed terms; that at the same time they also over-index, cluttering the index with irrelevant entries and redundant subheadings; and that AI-generated indexes also fail a standard copy-editor’s test for accuracy. The current paper indicates that AIs have not improved significantly on any measure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Indexer
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3828/index.2026.31
Primary Topic
Publishing and Scholarly Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

AI and book indexing: trajectory data

Elizabeth Bartmess, Michele R. Combs
The Indexer
Publishing and Scholarly Communication
article

AI and book indexing: trajectory data

Elizabeth Bartmess, Michele R. Combs
article en

Abstract

While artificial intelligence (AI) can be a highly useful tool in some situations and with some highly defined problem spaces, book indexing does not appear to be one of them. This paper supplements our previously published white papers by comparing the effectiveness of large language model AI chatbots, across multiple generations, at indexing a book or book chapter. Our earlier white papers indicated that AI-generated indexes fail to reflect subtopics and related topics, preventing readers from having appropriate access to all indexable material; that AIs under-index, failing to pick up on significantly discussed terms; that at the same time they also over-index, cluttering the index with irrelevant entries and redundant subheadings; and that AI-generated indexes also fail a standard copy-editor’s test for accuracy. The current paper indicates that AIs have not improved significantly on any measure.

The IndexerVol. 44(3)
American Society of Civil Engineers (US), American Society for Indexing (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Publishing and Scholarly Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

AI and book indexing: trajectory data — Elizabeth Bartmess, Michele R. Combs · The Indexer (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS