Reducing distress during vaccine injections: 2026 clinical practice guideline update

Background: Distress (pain, fear) is the most common adverse reaction associated with vaccination. This 2026 guideline updates the 2015 Help ELiminate Pain in Kids & Adults (HELPinKids&Adults) Collaborative recommendations for reducing vaccination-related distress. Methods: We used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to select the clinical questions and critical and important outcomes, and to determine the certainty of evidence and strength of the recommendations. We aligned guideline processes and reporting with the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II tool. The intended audience includes clinicians and organizations that deliver vaccinations, and vaccine recipients and their support persons. Guideline panel members representing different knowledge user groups, including vaccine recipients and support persons, voted on clinical questions and outcomes. We categorized interventions into 5 domains of distress management, the 5Ps: process (education and implementation), procedural (injection techniques), physical (body position and activity), pharmacologic (medication), and psychological (thoughts and behaviour). Five systematic reviews combined evidence from randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials identified using database (up to Jan. 31, 2025) and hand searching, supplemented by contacting experts. Evidence summaries were presented at a guideline meeting, and voting panel members drafted recommendations using the GRADE evidence-to-decision framework, considering certainty of the evidence, magnitude of effect, and contextual factors. We applied the Guidelines International Network principles to manage competing interests. Recommendations: In the 5Ps framework, process-related interventions apply to all user groups. Procedural recommendations are directed at clinicians and organizations responsible for delivering vaccinations. Physical, pharmacologic, and psychological recommendations are targeted at vaccine recipients and support persons and incorporate choice. We developed 16 recommendations across the 5Ps framework, directed to different user groups. Of these, 7 are strong recommendations in favour of interventions (e.g., multicomponent process interventions, oral nutritive and non-nutritive interventions for infants), primarily supported by moderate- to high-certainty evidence. The remaining 9 are conditional recommendations based on low to very low certainty of evidence: 4 in favour of specific interventions (e.g., reducing fear cues) and 5 advising against other interventions (e.g., video or movie distraction in infants). Interpretation: This guideline presents evidence-based strategies to manage vaccination-related distress. Implementing recommendations can improve the quality of vaccine delivery and promote person-centred care by aligning interventions with vaccine recipient and support person preferences.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Medical Association Journal
Published
2026-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.260123
Primary Topic
Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Reducing distress during vaccine injections: 2026 clinical practice guideline update

Sabrina Kolker, Julene Cranch, Scott A. Halperin, C. Meghan McMurtry et al.
Canadian Medical Association Journal
Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
article

Reducing distress during vaccine injections: 2026 clinical practice guideline update

Sabrina Kolker, Julene Cranch, Scott A. Halperin, C. Meghan McMurtry, Shaindy Alexander, Anna Taddio, Lyndsay Howitt, Noni E. MacDonald, Janet Probst, Kathleen Ross, Vibhuti Shah, E K Lang, Rebecca Pillai Riddell, Elissa M. Abrams, Elizabeth Uleryk, Jocelyn Marcelo Cortes, Marion Guenther, Stéphane Girouard, Sarah Siamaki, Erin Kryschuk, Ripudaman Minhas, Christina Jensen, Betty Golightly, Melanie Noel, Jeannette Comeau, Lauralee Gallinger, Lucie M. Bucci, Michael J. Rieder
article en

Abstract

Background: Distress (pain, fear) is the most common adverse reaction associated with vaccination. This 2026 guideline updates the 2015 Help ELiminate Pain in Kids & Adults (HELPinKids&Adults) Collaborative recommendations for reducing vaccination-related distress. Methods: We used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to select the clinical questions and critical and important outcomes, and to determine the certainty of evidence and strength of the recommendations. We aligned guideline processes and reporting with the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II tool. The intended audience includes clinicians and organizations that deliver vaccinations, and vaccine recipients and their support persons. Guideline panel members representing different knowledge user groups, including vaccine recipients and support persons, voted on clinical questions and outcomes. We categorized interventions into 5 domains of distress management, the 5Ps: process (education and implementation), procedural (injection techniques), physical (body position and activity), pharmacologic (medication), and psychological (thoughts and behaviour). Five systematic reviews combined evidence from randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials identified using database (up to Jan. 31, 2025) and hand searching, supplemented by contacting experts. Evidence summaries were presented at a guideline meeting, and voting panel members drafted recommendations using the GRADE evidence-to-decision framework, considering certainty of the evidence, magnitude of effect, and contextual factors. We applied the Guidelines International Network principles to manage competing interests. Recommendations: In the 5Ps framework, process-related interventions apply to all user groups. Procedural recommendations are directed at clinicians and organizations responsible for delivering vaccinations. Physical, pharmacologic, and psychological recommendations are targeted at vaccine recipients and support persons and incorporate choice. We developed 16 recommendations across the 5Ps framework, directed to different user groups. Of these, 7 are strong recommendations in favour of interventions (e.g., multicomponent process interventions, oral nutritive and non-nutritive interventions for infants), primarily supported by moderate- to high-certainty evidence. The remaining 9 are conditional recommendations based on low to very low certainty of evidence: 4 in favour of specific interventions (e.g., reducing fear cues) and 5 advising against other interventions (e.g., video or movie distraction in infants). Interpretation: This guideline presents evidence-based strategies to manage vaccination-related distress. Implementing recommendations can improve the quality of vaccine delivery and promote person-centred care by aligning interventions with vaccine recipient and support person preferences.

Canadian Medical Association JournalVol. 198(32)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.