Simulating Regional‐Scale Aerosol Radiative Effects of Wildfire Smoke Using a High‐Resolution Coupled Meteorology‐Chemistry Model: HRRR‐Chem

Abstract Wildfires are increasing in frequency and intensity, strongly influencing both regional air quality and the Earth's radiation budget via their aerosol emissions. Relying on an unparalleled observational data set from the 2019 NOAA/NASA FIREX‐AQ campaign, this study quantifies the direct radiative effects of two wildfires using the HRRR‐Chem. Model predictions agree well with observed aerosol absorption, composition, and mass concentrations in fresh smoke (PM 2.5 > 1,500 μg m −3 ). Our results show pronounced regional direct radiative effects, including daily mean surface cooling exceeding −150 W m −2 and atmospheric warming up to +40 W m −2 in dense plumes. However, our analysis indicates that surface cooling is underestimated in the densest fresh smoke plumes due to aerosol scattering underpredictions. This scattering underestimation is linked to the grid‐scale dilution of dense fresh‐smoke gradients at the 3 km scale, as well as challenges in capturing complex fresh‐smoke particle size distributions using prescribed emission sizes within modal aerosol schemes, emphasizing the need for fire‐specific emission parameters in future biomass burning modeling studies. Furthermore, sensitivity analyses reveal that the volatility of primary organic aerosol is the dominant source of uncertainty in the direct radiative effect (up to 80%), while the optical properties of brown carbon and aerosol mixing state contribute 10%–20% and 5%–15% uncertainty, respectively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025jd046147
Primary Topic
Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Simulating Regional‐Scale Aerosol Radiative Effects of Wildfire Smoke Using a High‐Resolution Coupled Meteorology‐Chemistry Model: HRRR‐Chem

Pawan Gupta, О. В. Калашникова, Sudheer R. Bhimireddy, Pedro Campuzano‐Jost et al.
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
article

Simulating Regional‐Scale Aerosol Radiative Effects of Wildfire Smoke Using a High‐Resolution Coupled Meteorology‐Chemistry Model: HRRR‐Chem

Pawan Gupta, О. В. Калашникова, Sudheer R. Bhimireddy, Pedro Campuzano‐Jost, Jordan L. Schnell, Haiqin Li, Johana Romero‐Alvarez, T. F. Eck, Ravan Ahmadov, Minsu Choi, Joshua Peter Schwarz, Hongyu Guo, Jose Luis Jimenez, Chuanyu Xu, Fangjun Li, R. Bradley Pierce, Georg A. Grell, Philippe Goloub
article en

Abstract

Abstract Wildfires are increasing in frequency and intensity, strongly influencing both regional air quality and the Earth's radiation budget via their aerosol emissions. Relying on an unparalleled observational data set from the 2019 NOAA/NASA FIREX‐AQ campaign, this study quantifies the direct radiative effects of two wildfires using the HRRR‐Chem. Model predictions agree well with observed aerosol absorption, composition, and mass concentrations in fresh smoke (PM 2.5 > 1,500 μg m −3 ). Our results show pronounced regional direct radiative effects, including daily mean surface cooling exceeding −150 W m −2 and atmospheric warming up to +40 W m −2 in dense plumes. However, our analysis indicates that surface cooling is underestimated in the densest fresh smoke plumes due to aerosol scattering underpredictions. This scattering underestimation is linked to the grid‐scale dilution of dense fresh‐smoke gradients at the 3 km scale, as well as challenges in capturing complex fresh‐smoke particle size distributions using prescribed emission sizes within modal aerosol schemes, emphasizing the need for fire‐specific emission parameters in future biomass burning modeling studies. Furthermore, sensitivity analyses reveal that the volatility of primary organic aerosol is the dominant source of uncertainty in the direct radiative effect (up to 80%), while the optical properties of brown carbon and aerosol mixing state contribute 10%–20% and 5%–15% uncertainty, respectively.

Journal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresVol. 131(18)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Goddard Space Flight Center (US), Jet Propulsion Laboratory (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (US), University of Colorado Boulder (US), Geospatial Research (United Kingdom) (GB), Laboratoire d'Optique Atmosphérique (FR), NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory (US), NOAA Global Systems Laboratory, University of Maryland, Baltimore County (US), NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.