Dysregulated Cerebellar–Subcortical–Cortical Interactions in Cluster Headache: Evidence From Edge Analysis Across Three Independent Datasets
Objective The objective of this study was to apply edge‐centric functional connectivity and motif analyses to capture co‐fluctuation communication patterns and test whether altered dynamic network integration underlies clinical manifestations of cluster headache (CH). Methods This cross‐sectional study included 100 participants with episodic CH imaged during the in‐bout period outside acute attacks and 116 healthy controls (HCs) using functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Robustness of the findings was assessed via pooled and separate analyses of 3 independent datasets using brain parcellation, edge graph construction, k‐means clustering, community entropy calculations, motif, and clinical correlation analyses. Results Participants with CH showed lower entropy in the cerebellar vermis ( β = −0.493, 95% confidence interval [CI] = −0.683 to −0.302, p false discovery rate [ p FDR ] = 3.02 × 10 −6 ) and cerebellar network (mean difference = −0.043, 95% CI = −0.068 to −0.018, t = −3.361, p FDR = 0.009) compared with HCs. In individuals with CH, longer disease duration was accompanied by a greater reduction in entropy of the cerebellar vermis ( r = −0.390, 95% CI = −0.550 to −0.196, p FDR = 0.004). Motif analysis revealed that participants with CH exhibited (i) higher fractions of forked triads with vermis coordinating subcortical and cortical nodes belonging to sensorimotor, visual, default‐mode, and cerebellar networks; and (ii) lower fractions of diverse triads linking vermis to both sensorimotor and cognitive‐ control networks and to both sensorimotor and default‐mode networks (all p FDR < 0.05). Interpretation We identified reorganization of the cerebellar–subcortical–cortical network in CH. The cerebellar vermis exhibited a paradoxical pattern: retaining hub‐like connectivity while losing flexible network integration. This pattern worsened with disease duration, supporting its role in symptomatology and potential as a candidate region for future neuromodulation studies. ANN NEUROL 2026
Authors
- Chenghui Pi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6845-4031)
- Xin Lou (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2980-5171)
- Zhao Dong (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4581-2569)
- Lixia Tian (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8952-5158)
- Xiting Nie
- Wei Dai (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7015-2531)
- Xiangbing Bian (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7016-6503)
- Shengyuan Yu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8933-088X)
- 姚国恩
- Yueqi Guo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2731-1058)
- Xinbo Xing
- Xiao Zang
- Catherine D Chong
- Yun‐Xia Wang
- Yun Chen
- Yuhan Wu
- Zhe Yu
- Mingjie Zhang
- Anders Hougaard
- Hui Su
- Shuhua Zhang
Institutions
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- Beijing Jiaotong University (CN)
- WinnMed (US)
- Gentofte Hospital (DK)
- Chinese PLA General Hospital (CN)
- Mayo Clinic in Florida (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Annals of Neurology
- Published
- 2026-09-21
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.78361
- Primary Topic
- Migraine and Headache Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00