Data-Driven Multiparameter Predictive Analysis of Cochlear Implant Rehabilitation Outcomes

Objective: This study analyzes intersections between preoperative predictors of postcochlear implant (CI) hearing outcomes to address the gap in counseling CI candidates on postoperative hearing expectations beyond binary candidacy criteria. Study design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Tertiary academic medical center and a third-party CI database. Methods: Preoperative audiometric measures included word recognition score (WRS) and pure-tone average (PTA) for the unimplanted contralateral ear (CE) and implanted ear (IE). Postoperative WRS assessments extended to 500 days postsurgery, with the ~6-month mark as the primary outcome time point. Treatment success was defined as a postoperative WRS≥60% or clinically meaningful improvement (Δ WRS ≥20%) for individuals with preoperative WRS≥30%. Statistical analyses included heatmaps and Kaplan-Meier plots to assess relationships between preoperative variables and time to treatment success. Results: Both CE and IE audiometric status demonstrated comparable predictive ability for CI outcomes when using the WRS<60% and PTA>60 criteria; however, IE status had a higher F1 score (0.27 vs. 0.069). Age was a critical modifier; patients below 60 years achieved treatment success faster than older patients (275 vs. 470 d; HR=0.41; 95% CI: 0.31-0.55, P <0.05). Patients below 60 years achieved hearing improvement at a significantly faster rate when using a pre-PTA<60 dB than a pre-PTA≥60 dB (HR=0.47, 95% CI: 0.22-0.99, P <0.05). Among older patients, those with CE WRS≥60% had a substantially higher likelihood of improvement compared with those with WRS <60% (HR=5.15; 95% CI: 3.29-8.08, P <0.05). Conclusion: Preoperative audiometric predictors of CI success vary significantly by age, with younger patients benefiting from residual hearing in the implanted ear and older patients relying on their contralateral, unimplanted ear for rehabilitation. These age-stratified patterns enable more personalized prognostic counseling about expected time to functional hearing improvement following cochlear implantation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Otology & Neurotology
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/mao.0000000000005076
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Data-Driven Multiparameter Predictive Analysis of Cochlear Implant Rehabilitation Outcomes

Yew Song Cheng, Connie Chang-Chien, Stephanie M. Younan, Nicole T. Jiam et al.
Otology & Neurotology
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
article

Data-Driven Multiparameter Predictive Analysis of Cochlear Implant Rehabilitation Outcomes

Yew Song Cheng, Connie Chang-Chien, Stephanie M. Younan, Nicole T. Jiam, Max Jiam
article en

Abstract

Objective: This study analyzes intersections between preoperative predictors of postcochlear implant (CI) hearing outcomes to address the gap in counseling CI candidates on postoperative hearing expectations beyond binary candidacy criteria. Study design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Tertiary academic medical center and a third-party CI database. Methods: Preoperative audiometric measures included word recognition score (WRS) and pure-tone average (PTA) for the unimplanted contralateral ear (CE) and implanted ear (IE). Postoperative WRS assessments extended to 500 days postsurgery, with the ~6-month mark as the primary outcome time point. Treatment success was defined as a postoperative WRS≥60% or clinically meaningful improvement (Δ WRS ≥20%) for individuals with preoperative WRS≥30%. Statistical analyses included heatmaps and Kaplan-Meier plots to assess relationships between preoperative variables and time to treatment success. Results: Both CE and IE audiometric status demonstrated comparable predictive ability for CI outcomes when using the WRS<60% and PTA>60 criteria; however, IE status had a higher F1 score (0.27 vs. 0.069). Age was a critical modifier; patients below 60 years achieved treatment success faster than older patients (275 vs. 470 d; HR=0.41; 95% CI: 0.31-0.55, P <0.05). Patients below 60 years achieved hearing improvement at a significantly faster rate when using a pre-PTA<60 dB than a pre-PTA≥60 dB (HR=0.47, 95% CI: 0.22-0.99, P <0.05). Among older patients, those with CE WRS≥60% had a substantially higher likelihood of improvement compared with those with WRS <60% (HR=5.15; 95% CI: 3.29-8.08, P <0.05). Conclusion: Preoperative audiometric predictors of CI success vary significantly by age, with younger patients benefiting from residual hearing in the implanted ear and older patients relying on their contralateral, unimplanted ear for rehabilitation. These age-stratified patterns enable more personalized prognostic counseling about expected time to functional hearing improvement following cochlear implantation.

Otology & Neurotology
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Data-Driven Multiparameter Predictive Analysis of Cochlear Implant Rehabilitation Outcomes — Yew Song Cheng, Connie Chang-Chien, et al. · Otology & Neurotology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS