Origins of Surveillance Technology in the United States

This article traces the origins of surveillance technology in the United States from nineteenth-century telegraphy to twenty-first-century biometric and pharmaceutical monitoring. Background: Popular accounts treat mass surveillance as an artifact of the digital age, yet its institutional logics and legal doctrines were established alongside the communication technologies of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Methods: The study synthesizes historical, legal, and surveillance-studies scholarships into a chronological account organized around three recurring patterns. Results: Function creep, crisis-driven expansion, and doctrinal lag appear repeatedly from the Civil War telegraph through post-9/11 bulk collection to present-day biometric and prescription-drug monitoring. The Fourth Amendment third-party doctrine serves as the central hinge permitting routine collection of personal records. Conclusions: The migration of surveillance from communications to the body—prescription drug monitoring programs and biometric health databases—represents continuity rather than rupture, and meaningful constraint requires structural, warrant-based limits keyed to the sensitivity of information rather than to the involved technologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Societies
Published
2026-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/soc16090300
Primary Topic
Historical and Scientific Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Origins of Surveillance Technology in the United States

Richard H. Parrish
Societies
Historical and Scientific Studies
article

Origins of Surveillance Technology in the United States

Richard H. Parrish
article en

Abstract

This article traces the origins of surveillance technology in the United States from nineteenth-century telegraphy to twenty-first-century biometric and pharmaceutical monitoring. Background: Popular accounts treat mass surveillance as an artifact of the digital age, yet its institutional logics and legal doctrines were established alongside the communication technologies of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Methods: The study synthesizes historical, legal, and surveillance-studies scholarships into a chronological account organized around three recurring patterns. Results: Function creep, crisis-driven expansion, and doctrinal lag appear repeatedly from the Civil War telegraph through post-9/11 bulk collection to present-day biometric and prescription-drug monitoring. The Fourth Amendment third-party doctrine serves as the central hinge permitting routine collection of personal records. Conclusions: The migration of surveillance from communications to the body—prescription drug monitoring programs and biometric health databases—represents continuity rather than rupture, and meaningful constraint requires structural, warrant-based limits keyed to the sensitivity of information rather than to the involved technologies.

SocietiesVol. 16(9)
Walmart (United States) (US), Alice L. Walton School of Medicine (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Historical and Scientific Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.