Crystal Structure Prediction of Inorganic Materials: A Benchmark and Modern Evaluation

Crystal structure prediction (CSP) of inorganic materials is a fundamental challenge in computational materials science, yet the field has historically lacked well‐defined benchmarks and comprehensive evaluations. We address this gap by introducing CSP180, a standardized benchmark of 180 inorganic materials, and evaluate 13 state‐of‐the‐art CSP algorithms spanning template‐based, machine learning (ML) potential‐based, and deep learning‐based approaches, none relying on density functional theory (DFT). As a baseline, we also assess the leading DFT‐based algorithms, CALYPSO and USPEX, on a 23‐structure subset with simpler compositions. Template‐based methods, such as TCSP and CSPML, achieve the highest space group match rates (58.9% and 47.2%) when a suitable template exists, while de novo algorithms struggle to identify correct space groups, with the best performers reaching only around 17%. On the 23‐structure subset, ML potential‐based algorithms prove highly competitive with DFT‐based methods at identifying lower‐energy structures, and this performance depends strongly on both potential quality and search algorithm efficiency. This assessment provides a standardized framework, quantitative metrics, and open‐source tools to guide future CSP development and accelerate materials discovery. Code and benchmark data are available at https://github.com/usccolumbia/cspbenchmark .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced Intelligent Discovery
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/aidi.70162
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Materials Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Crystal Structure Prediction of Inorganic Materials: A Benchmark and Modern Evaluation

Rongzhi Dong, Lai Wei, Yuqi Song, Nihang Fu et al.
Advanced Intelligent Discovery
Machine Learning in Materials Science
article

Crystal Structure Prediction of Inorganic Materials: A Benchmark and Modern Evaluation

Rongzhi Dong, Lai Wei, Yuqi Song, Nihang Fu, Jianjun Hu, Edirisuriya M. Dilanga Siriwardane, Meiling Xu, Ming Hu, Chris M. Wolverton, Sadman Sadeed Omee
article en

Abstract

Crystal structure prediction (CSP) of inorganic materials is a fundamental challenge in computational materials science, yet the field has historically lacked well‐defined benchmarks and comprehensive evaluations. We address this gap by introducing CSP180, a standardized benchmark of 180 inorganic materials, and evaluate 13 state‐of‐the‐art CSP algorithms spanning template‐based, machine learning (ML) potential‐based, and deep learning‐based approaches, none relying on density functional theory (DFT). As a baseline, we also assess the leading DFT‐based algorithms, CALYPSO and USPEX, on a 23‐structure subset with simpler compositions. Template‐based methods, such as TCSP and CSPML, achieve the highest space group match rates (58.9% and 47.2%) when a suitable template exists, while de novo algorithms struggle to identify correct space groups, with the best performers reaching only around 17%. On the 23‐structure subset, ML potential‐based algorithms prove highly competitive with DFT‐based methods at identifying lower‐energy structures, and this performance depends strongly on both potential quality and search algorithm efficiency. This assessment provides a standardized framework, quantitative metrics, and open‐source tools to guide future CSP development and accelerate materials discovery. Code and benchmark data are available at https://github.com/usccolumbia/cspbenchmark .

Advanced Intelligent Discovery
Northwestern University (US), Jiangsu Normal University (CN), University of South Carolina (US), University of Southern Maine (US), University of Colombo (LK)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Machine Learning in Materials Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.