Pressure Points

Introduction: Simulation-based education plays a central role in preparing health care professionals for practice. Although psychological safety is emphasized, simulation can evoke significant stress. Existing research largely captures global or retrospective stress measures, offering limited insight into how stress unfolds during simulation. This study examined patterns of physiological stress in final-year medical students during simulated clinical scenarios, identified activities associated with heightened stress, and characterized inter-individual variability in stress trajectories. Methods: In this prospective observational study, 40 final-year medical students individually managed an acutely deteriorating simulated patient during formative ward-based scenarios. Heart rate variability was continuously recorded using Polar H10 chest straps, and the Stress Index was calculated in 10-second segments. Video recordings were time-matched to physiological data and coded into 16 clinical activities. Mixed-design analysis of variance examined differences in stress across activities and scenario phases (anticipation, start, during, presenting). Results: Stress varied significantly across participants (η 2 = 0.40) and activities (η 2 = 0.06), with a significant participant-by-activity interaction (η 2 = 0.26). Higher stress occurred during activities involving uncertainty and socioevaluative elements (heading to the simulation room, receiving nurse handover, presenting to senior clinician, gathering additional information during questioning). Lower stress occurred during history taking, physical examination, and ordering investigations. Stress was highest during the “start and anticipation” phases and lower “during and presenting.” Learner clusters showed phase-specific stress patterns. Conclusions: Physiological stress during simulation is dynamic, individualized, and clustered around identifiable “pressure points.” These findings extend simulation research beyond global measures and highlight the importance of simulation facilitation that recognizes individual variability in learners’ experiences.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Simulation in Healthcare The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/sih.0000000000000967
Primary Topic
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Pressure Points

Vicki R. LeBlanc, Kathryn Larkin, Jenny Tucker, William Lea et al.
Simulation in Healthcare The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
article

Pressure Points

Vicki R. LeBlanc, Kathryn Larkin, Jenny Tucker, William Lea, Shay Patel, Tracy McEwan, Lucy Ambrose, Tina Duncalf
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Simulation-based education plays a central role in preparing health care professionals for practice. Although psychological safety is emphasized, simulation can evoke significant stress. Existing research largely captures global or retrospective stress measures, offering limited insight into how stress unfolds during simulation. This study examined patterns of physiological stress in final-year medical students during simulated clinical scenarios, identified activities associated with heightened stress, and characterized inter-individual variability in stress trajectories. Methods: In this prospective observational study, 40 final-year medical students individually managed an acutely deteriorating simulated patient during formative ward-based scenarios. Heart rate variability was continuously recorded using Polar H10 chest straps, and the Stress Index was calculated in 10-second segments. Video recordings were time-matched to physiological data and coded into 16 clinical activities. Mixed-design analysis of variance examined differences in stress across activities and scenario phases (anticipation, start, during, presenting). Results: Stress varied significantly across participants (η 2 = 0.40) and activities (η 2 = 0.06), with a significant participant-by-activity interaction (η 2 = 0.26). Higher stress occurred during activities involving uncertainty and socioevaluative elements (heading to the simulation room, receiving nurse handover, presenting to senior clinician, gathering additional information during questioning). Lower stress occurred during history taking, physical examination, and ordering investigations. Stress was highest during the “start and anticipation” phases and lower “during and presenting.” Learner clusters showed phase-specific stress patterns. Conclusions: Physiological stress during simulation is dynamic, individualized, and clustered around identifiable “pressure points.” These findings extend simulation research beyond global measures and highlight the importance of simulation facilitation that recognizes individual variability in learners’ experiences.

Simulation in Healthcare The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.