A Scoring Rubric for Evaluating Montessori and Preschool Programmes: A Review of 18 Leading Preschool & Montessori Brands in India

A desk-based review that develops and demonstrates a quality-evaluation instrument for early-childhood-education providers in India. The paper introduces a ten-domain, weighted scoring rubric — spanning curriculum fidelity, teacher qualification, teacher–student ratio, prepared environment and materials, safety and hygiene, individualised observation and assessment, parent engagement, outdoor and practical-life spaces, accreditation, and fee transparency — that combines ordinal domain scores into a single composite quality score on a [1, 5] scale, with a five-band classification function and a worked example. It then applies the rubric illustratively to 18 preschool and Montessori brands operating in India, spanning mass-franchise networks, Montessori-specific chains, and premium international-curriculum brands, and maps each rubric domain to the relevant UN Sustainable Development Goal 4.2 targets and indicators. The central argument is that, in the absence of an official ranking body for Indian preschools, the rubric — not brand name — should be the primary evaluation tool applied to any specific centre before enrolment.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22870907
Primary Topic
Education Methods and Practices
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
preprint

A Scoring Rubric for Evaluating Montessori and Preschool Programmes: A Review of 18 Leading Preschool & Montessori Brands in India

Shobha Goyal, Veera Bhuvana Chandra Chennamsetty, Durga Lakshmi Prasanna Kovvuri, Sree Lekha Pappireddy
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Education Methods and Practices
preprint

A Scoring Rubric for Evaluating Montessori and Preschool Programmes: A Review of 18 Leading Preschool & Montessori Brands in India

Shobha Goyal, Veera Bhuvana Chandra Chennamsetty, Durga Lakshmi Prasanna Kovvuri, Sree Lekha Pappireddy
preprint en

Abstract

A desk-based review that develops and demonstrates a quality-evaluation instrument for early-childhood-education providers in India. The paper introduces a ten-domain, weighted scoring rubric — spanning curriculum fidelity, teacher qualification, teacher–student ratio, prepared environment and materials, safety and hygiene, individualised observation and assessment, parent engagement, outdoor and practical-life spaces, accreditation, and fee transparency — that combines ordinal domain scores into a single composite quality score on a [1, 5] scale, with a five-band classification function and a worked example. It then applies the rubric illustratively to 18 preschool and Montessori brands operating in India, spanning mass-franchise networks, Montessori-specific chains, and premium international-curriculum brands, and maps each rubric domain to the relevant UN Sustainable Development Goal 4.2 targets and indicators. The central argument is that, in the absence of an official ranking body for Indian preschools, the rubric — not brand name — should be the primary evaluation tool applied to any specific centre before enrolment.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quality Education
Education Methods and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.