Speaking up for security: the role of safety voice in improving organizational information security

Purpose The study aims to investigate the role of employee safety voice in improving a company's information security program. Design/methodology/approach This study used an experimental design using visual vignettes, mixing four types of safety voice with the gender of the manager. Findings Male employees appear to be more effective at influencing managerial intentions to improve security than female employees. Hostile voice was less likely to have an influence on policy making than other voice types. Research limitations/implications This cross-disciplinary study bridges information security research with safety science to investigate the role of employee safety voice in influencing supervisor information security decision making. Beyond testing the limits of safety voice in an untried context (information security), the stimuli used in this study may serve as a primer for researchers interested in a more engaging vignette than the more traditional text-based scenario. Originality/value To our knowledge, employee voice toward offering input toward information security policies has not been previously investigated. Little research in social science has made use of the visual vignettes as stimuli as this study has.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Organizational Cybersecurity Journal Practice Process and People
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ocj-08-2025-0033
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Safety Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Speaking up for security: the role of safety voice in improving organizational information security

Kent Marett, Emily G. Marett
Organizational Cybersecurity Journal Practice Process and People
Occupational Health and Safety Research
article

Speaking up for security: the role of safety voice in improving organizational information security

Kent Marett, Emily G. Marett
article en

Abstract

Purpose The study aims to investigate the role of employee safety voice in improving a company's information security program. Design/methodology/approach This study used an experimental design using visual vignettes, mixing four types of safety voice with the gender of the manager. Findings Male employees appear to be more effective at influencing managerial intentions to improve security than female employees. Hostile voice was less likely to have an influence on policy making than other voice types. Research limitations/implications This cross-disciplinary study bridges information security research with safety science to investigate the role of employee safety voice in influencing supervisor information security decision making. Beyond testing the limits of safety voice in an untried context (information security), the stimuli used in this study may serve as a primer for researchers interested in a more engaging vignette than the more traditional text-based scenario. Originality/value To our knowledge, employee voice toward offering input toward information security policies has not been previously investigated. Little research in social science has made use of the visual vignettes as stimuli as this study has.

Organizational Cybersecurity Journal Practice Process and People
Mississippi State University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions, Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Occupational Health and Safety Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.