Effective Regeneration of Flue Gas Wastewater by One-Step Hydrothermal Removal of High Concentrations of Nitrate and Sulfate

Wet flue-gas purification in non-ferrous smelting facilities consumes large volumes of fresh water and generates wastewater rich in sulfate and nitrate. On-site recirculation of this wastewater is currently limited by progressive nitrate accumulation, because no conventional single-step technology can simultaneously remove sulfate and nitrate; the available routes are separate, energy- or reagent-intensive steps that either transfer nitrate into hazardous mixed salts or generate secondary sludge. The raw wastewater investigated here contained 53.3–57.5 g/L nitrate, 10.5–12.5 g/L sulfate, approximately 1.35 g/L TOC, and trace Cr, Cu, and Al. Herein, we report a one-step hydrothermal process in which an organic iron reagent, ferric citrate, simultaneously removes sulfate and nitrate from flue-gas wastewater at a moderate temperature of 120 °C—a temperature attainable with low-grade waste heat that is otherwise unrecovered on site. The advancement of knowledge lies in the underlying chemistry: thermally activated electron transfer from the citrate ligand to Fe3+ generates Fe2+, which catalytically reduces nitrate (>99% removal), while Fe3+ concurrently precipitates sulfate (and co-removes Cr and Al) as schwertmannite, an iron oxyhydroxysulfate that itself becomes a potentially recyclable iron resource. Subsequent neutralization with Ca(OH)2 further reduced residual sulfate to 4.1 g/L, making the water suitable for return to the flue-gas purification loop after optional polishing. For plant operators and decision-makers, the implication is that the current evaporation-to-hazardous-salt practice can, in principle, be replaced by a closed water cycle driven by the plant’s own waste heat, thereby reducing freshwater withdrawal, avoiding the disposal of a nitrate-bearing mixed salt, and recovering an iron-rich by-product.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Resources
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/resources15090124
Primary Topic
Industrial Gas Emission Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Effective Regeneration of Flue Gas Wastewater by One-Step Hydrothermal Removal of High Concentrations of Nitrate and Sulfate

Suiyi Zhu, Hua Kang, Xin Lan, Dandan Yang et al.
Resources
Industrial Gas Emission Control
article

Effective Regeneration of Flue Gas Wastewater by One-Step Hydrothermal Removal of High Concentrations of Nitrate and Sulfate

Suiyi Zhu, Hua Kang, Xin Lan, Dandan Yang, Yu Chen, Yingzi Lin
article en

Abstract

Wet flue-gas purification in non-ferrous smelting facilities consumes large volumes of fresh water and generates wastewater rich in sulfate and nitrate. On-site recirculation of this wastewater is currently limited by progressive nitrate accumulation, because no conventional single-step technology can simultaneously remove sulfate and nitrate; the available routes are separate, energy- or reagent-intensive steps that either transfer nitrate into hazardous mixed salts or generate secondary sludge. The raw wastewater investigated here contained 53.3–57.5 g/L nitrate, 10.5–12.5 g/L sulfate, approximately 1.35 g/L TOC, and trace Cr, Cu, and Al. Herein, we report a one-step hydrothermal process in which an organic iron reagent, ferric citrate, simultaneously removes sulfate and nitrate from flue-gas wastewater at a moderate temperature of 120 °C—a temperature attainable with low-grade waste heat that is otherwise unrecovered on site. The advancement of knowledge lies in the underlying chemistry: thermally activated electron transfer from the citrate ligand to Fe3+ generates Fe2+, which catalytically reduces nitrate (>99% removal), while Fe3+ concurrently precipitates sulfate (and co-removes Cr and Al) as schwertmannite, an iron oxyhydroxysulfate that itself becomes a potentially recyclable iron resource. Subsequent neutralization with Ca(OH)2 further reduced residual sulfate to 4.1 g/L, making the water suitable for return to the flue-gas purification loop after optional polishing. For plant operators and decision-makers, the implication is that the current evaporation-to-hazardous-salt practice can, in principle, be replaced by a closed water cycle driven by the plant’s own waste heat, thereby reducing freshwater withdrawal, avoiding the disposal of a nitrate-bearing mixed salt, and recovering an iron-rich by-product.

ResourcesVol. 15(9)
Northeast Normal University (CN), Jilin Jianzhu University (CN), Changchun Institute of Technology (CN), Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering (CN)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Industrial Gas Emission Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.