A ‘new dawn’? Ramaphosa’s South Africa on the UN Human Rights Council

During the presidencies of Thabo Mbeki and Jacob Zuma, South Africa’s foreign policy was marked by widespread opposition to international human rights. Has this been the case under Cyril Ramaphosa? The article examines this question by comparing South Africa’s actions on the UN Human Rights Council to the years prior and during Ramaphosa’s presidency. It does so by examining South Africa’s voting on a broad range of issues: country-specific situations, political rights, sexual orientation and gender identity, the death penalty, terrorism and women’s rights. The article shows that under Ramaphosa South Africa has made a clear, albeit inconsistent, shift towards support for international human rights. This conclusion matters because it suggests that in a post-Western world states from the Global South will assist in shoring up the liberal international order.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
South African Journal of International Affairs
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10220461.2026.2733040
Primary Topic
Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

A ‘new dawn’? Ramaphosa’s South Africa on the UN Human Rights Council

Eduard Jordaan
South African Journal of International Affairs
Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics
article

A ‘new dawn’? Ramaphosa’s South Africa on the UN Human Rights Council

Eduard Jordaan
article en

Abstract

During the presidencies of Thabo Mbeki and Jacob Zuma, South Africa’s foreign policy was marked by widespread opposition to international human rights. Has this been the case under Cyril Ramaphosa? The article examines this question by comparing South Africa’s actions on the UN Human Rights Council to the years prior and during Ramaphosa’s presidency. It does so by examining South Africa’s voting on a broad range of issues: country-specific situations, political rights, sexual orientation and gender identity, the death penalty, terrorism and women’s rights. The article shows that under Ramaphosa South Africa has made a clear, albeit inconsistent, shift towards support for international human rights. This conclusion matters because it suggests that in a post-Western world states from the Global South will assist in shoring up the liberal international order.

South African Journal of International Affairs
Rhodes University (ZA)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A ‘new dawn’? Ramaphosa’s South Africa on the UN Human Rights Council — Eduard Jordaan · South African Journal of International Affairs (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS