Habitat suitability assessment of mouflon applying a comparative approach on expert-based and species distribution models

During the last decades, anthropogenic activities such as land use change and urbanization have caused significant biodiversity loss and ecosystem services disruption worldwide. Accurate identification and prioritization of suitable habitats, both within and beyond existing protected areas and ecological networks, require complementary habitat assessment models that evaluate species-specific suitability alongside habitat conservation priority. This study employed the maximum entropy (MaxEnt) and Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs (InVEST) models to assess the habitat of mouflon ( Ovis gmelini ) in central Iran. We specifically investigated how these models, with their distinct data inputs—MaxEnt relying on species occurrence and environmental variables, and InVEST utilizing land use/cover maps, and expert-based threat assessments—provide complementary insights for detecting and managing suitable habitats. Model performance was evaluated using the Area Under the Curve (AUC) of the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve and the Boyce Index (BI). The spatial outputs were further analyzed using the Getis-Ord Gi* statistic to identify statistically significant hotspots. The results indicated that MaxEnt was highly effective in identifying currently occupied (realized) suitable habitats within protected areas (AUC = 0.937, BI = 0.965), reflecting areas that are already being used by mouflon populations, whereas InVEST identified broader extents of potential habitats, including areas that are ecological suitable, but are not consistently or currently utilized by the species. The spatial overlap between models was only 7.3% within protected areas, underscoring their complementary nature. Hotspot analysis revealed that while areas of high habitat quality and high suitability overlapped in some core habitats, their spatial distributions also showed distinct differences. For enhancing conservation networks under data-poor conditions, InVEST offers valuable guidance by highlighting priority zones based on habitat quality and degradation. However, the combined application of both models provides a robust framework for conservation planning, enabling the identification of core habitats, connectivity corridors, and degraded areas requiring restoration. These findings are critical for conserving wide-ranging ungulates like the mouflon and support the development of resilient ecological networks in the face of anthropogenic and climate change pressures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0353063
Primary Topic
Species Distribution and Climate Change
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Habitat suitability assessment of mouflon applying a comparative approach on expert-based and species distribution models

Azita Rezvani, Sedighe Abdollahi, Sima Fakheran, Davoud Fadakar et al.
PLoS ONE
Species Distribution and Climate Change
article

Habitat suitability assessment of mouflon applying a comparative approach on expert-based and species distribution models

Azita Rezvani, Sedighe Abdollahi, Sima Fakheran, Davoud Fadakar, Shekoufeh Nematollahi
article en

Abstract

During the last decades, anthropogenic activities such as land use change and urbanization have caused significant biodiversity loss and ecosystem services disruption worldwide. Accurate identification and prioritization of suitable habitats, both within and beyond existing protected areas and ecological networks, require complementary habitat assessment models that evaluate species-specific suitability alongside habitat conservation priority. This study employed the maximum entropy (MaxEnt) and Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs (InVEST) models to assess the habitat of mouflon ( Ovis gmelini ) in central Iran. We specifically investigated how these models, with their distinct data inputs—MaxEnt relying on species occurrence and environmental variables, and InVEST utilizing land use/cover maps, and expert-based threat assessments—provide complementary insights for detecting and managing suitable habitats. Model performance was evaluated using the Area Under the Curve (AUC) of the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve and the Boyce Index (BI). The spatial outputs were further analyzed using the Getis-Ord Gi* statistic to identify statistically significant hotspots. The results indicated that MaxEnt was highly effective in identifying currently occupied (realized) suitable habitats within protected areas (AUC = 0.937, BI = 0.965), reflecting areas that are already being used by mouflon populations, whereas InVEST identified broader extents of potential habitats, including areas that are ecological suitable, but are not consistently or currently utilized by the species. The spatial overlap between models was only 7.3% within protected areas, underscoring their complementary nature. Hotspot analysis revealed that while areas of high habitat quality and high suitability overlapped in some core habitats, their spatial distributions also showed distinct differences. For enhancing conservation networks under data-poor conditions, InVEST offers valuable guidance by highlighting priority zones based on habitat quality and degradation. However, the combined application of both models provides a robust framework for conservation planning, enabling the identification of core habitats, connectivity corridors, and degraded areas requiring restoration. These findings are critical for conserving wide-ranging ungulates like the mouflon and support the development of resilient ecological networks in the face of anthropogenic and climate change pressures.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(9)
University of British Columbia (CA), Isfahan University of Technology (IR), Ferdowsi University of Mashhad (IR)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Species Distribution and Climate Change
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.