“At the Edges of the Law”: Discretionary Power and Humanitarian Negotiations in Migrant Return Counselling

European migration policies have placed a growing emphasis on returns – particularly for migrants who receive a negative asylum decision. The EU and national governments have made significant funds available for return and have relied on partnerships with humanitarian actors for implementing policies of Assisted Voluntary Return. Drawing on interviews at the municipal scale in Belgium and the Netherlands, this paper analyses how humanitarian practitioners enact discretionary power in providing socio-legal counselling to undocumented migrants around the question of return. I explore how humanitarian counsellors exercise discretionary power in a fraught space between resistance and complicity, as they negotiate alternatives to return for undocumented migrants within a larger (geo-)political context that is premised on migrant exclusion via return. This article contributes to scholarship in political and legal geography through a multi-scalar analysis of discretionary power in relation to migration, everyday engagements with law, and negotiated practices of the humanitarian border.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geopolitics
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2026.2733275
Primary Topic
Migration, Health and Trauma
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

“At the Edges of the Law”: Discretionary Power and Humanitarian Negotiations in Migrant Return Counselling

Austin Crane
Geopolitics
Migration, Health and Trauma
article

“At the Edges of the Law”: Discretionary Power and Humanitarian Negotiations in Migrant Return Counselling

Austin Crane
article en

Abstract

European migration policies have placed a growing emphasis on returns – particularly for migrants who receive a negative asylum decision. The EU and national governments have made significant funds available for return and have relied on partnerships with humanitarian actors for implementing policies of Assisted Voluntary Return. Drawing on interviews at the municipal scale in Belgium and the Netherlands, this paper analyses how humanitarian practitioners enact discretionary power in providing socio-legal counselling to undocumented migrants around the question of return. I explore how humanitarian counsellors exercise discretionary power in a fraught space between resistance and complicity, as they negotiate alternatives to return for undocumented migrants within a larger (geo-)political context that is premised on migrant exclusion via return. This article contributes to scholarship in political and legal geography through a multi-scalar analysis of discretionary power in relation to migration, everyday engagements with law, and negotiated practices of the humanitarian border.

Geopolitics
University of South Carolina (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Migration, Health and Trauma
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

“At the Edges of the Law”: Discretionary Power and Humanitarian Negotiations in Migrant Return Counselling — Austin Crane · Geopolitics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS