Towards global groundwater recharge estimation from GRACE-constrained GLDAS-CLSM data

Accurate estimation of groundwater recharge at regional to global scales is essential for sustainable water resource management, yet current methods lack consistency. This study introduces the groundwater storage fluctuation (GSF) method to derive gross recharge, total discharge (including both natural and human-related outflows that cannot be distinguished without additional data), and net recharge from GRACE-constrained GLDAS-2.2 CLSM groundwater storage (GWS) anomalies. Based on monthly GWS fluxes, the GSF method requires no seasonal templates or specific recharge-event identification. Global mean annual recharge for 2004-2024 is estimated at 16,081.5 km $$^{3}$$ /year, consistent with existing global hydrological models and multi-study averages (14,806 ± 1,721 km $$^{3}$$ /year). Recharge ranges from <100 mm/year in arid zones to >300 mm/year in humid tropical areas, with a non-significant global trend of 0.34 mm/year. Arid basins show the highest interannual variability, with coefficients of variation of 48% for the Murray-Darling Basin (Australia), 40% for São Francisco (Brazil), and 36% for Colorado (USA). Validation against an Australian chloride mass balance (CMB) dataset shows strong spatial agreement ( $$\\varvec{\\rho }$$ = 0.82). In the Murray-Darling Basin, CMB validation confirms this performance ( $$\\varvec{\\rho }$$ = 0.83 and a standard deviation, STD, of 32.1 mm/year). The underlying GWS, validated against 259 boreholes in the basin, correlates at 0.47 with an STD of 33.9 mm, within the bootstrap uncertainty limit of 38.2 mm. Results should be interpreted at GRACE’s effective resolution ( $$\\sim $$ 300 km), and grid-cell estimates in data-sparse or low signal-to-noise ratio areas should be used with caution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hydrogeology Journal
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-026-03169-1
Primary Topic
Groundwater and Watershed Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Towards global groundwater recharge estimation from GRACE-constrained GLDAS-CLSM data

Vagner Gonçalves Ferreira, Christopher Ndehedehe
Hydrogeology Journal
Groundwater and Watershed Analysis
article

Towards global groundwater recharge estimation from GRACE-constrained GLDAS-CLSM data

Vagner Gonçalves Ferreira, Christopher Ndehedehe
article en

Abstract

Accurate estimation of groundwater recharge at regional to global scales is essential for sustainable water resource management, yet current methods lack consistency. This study introduces the groundwater storage fluctuation (GSF) method to derive gross recharge, total discharge (including both natural and human-related outflows that cannot be distinguished without additional data), and net recharge from GRACE-constrained GLDAS-2.2 CLSM groundwater storage (GWS) anomalies. Based on monthly GWS fluxes, the GSF method requires no seasonal templates or specific recharge-event identification. Global mean annual recharge for 2004-2024 is estimated at 16,081.5 km $$^{3}$$ /year, consistent with existing global hydrological models and multi-study averages (14,806 ± 1,721 km $$^{3}$$ /year). Recharge ranges from <100 mm/year in arid zones to >300 mm/year in humid tropical areas, with a non-significant global trend of 0.34 mm/year. Arid basins show the highest interannual variability, with coefficients of variation of 48% for the Murray-Darling Basin (Australia), 40% for São Francisco (Brazil), and 36% for Colorado (USA). Validation against an Australian chloride mass balance (CMB) dataset shows strong spatial agreement ( $$\varvec{\rho }$$ = 0.82). In the Murray-Darling Basin, CMB validation confirms this performance ( $$\varvec{\rho }$$ = 0.83 and a standard deviation, STD, of 32.1 mm/year). The underlying GWS, validated against 259 boreholes in the basin, correlates at 0.47 with an STD of 33.9 mm, within the bootstrap uncertainty limit of 38.2 mm. Results should be interpreted at GRACE’s effective resolution ( $$\sim $$ 300 km), and grid-cell estimates in data-sparse or low signal-to-noise ratio areas should be used with caution.

Hydrogeology Journal
Griffith University (AU), Hohai University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Groundwater and Watershed Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Towards global groundwater recharge estimation from GRACE-constrained GLDAS-CLSM data — Vagner Gonçalves Ferreira, Christopher Ndehedehe · Hydrogeology Journal (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS