Sustained Three-Year Impact of a Physical Therapy Quality Improvement Project in the Medical Intensive Care Unit

IMPORTANCE: Early rehabilitation and mobility are components of care bundles and clinical practice guidelines for patients who are critically ill. Improved delivery of physical therapy is associated with decreased intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS). Barriers exist to optimizing the delivery of physical therapy. Analyses of quality improvement (QI) are often narrow in scope. Care improvements may not persist. Opportunities remain to improve physical therapy delivery to patients in the medical ICU (MICU) while analyzing care delivery and ICU LOS. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to determine whether a QI initiative sustained improvement in physical therapy delivery and associations with ICU LOS in the MICU. DESIGN: This was a before-during-after comparative design. SETTING: The study took place in the MICU at a quaternary, academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: The study included 13,058 MICU admissions. INTERVENTION(S): The intervention was a multifaceted physical therapy program including multidisciplinary education, physical therapists integrated into multidisciplinary rounds, automatic physical therapist consult orders, electronic health record (EHR) hard stop for bedrest orders, and increased physical therapy staffing including a program coordinator physical therapist. MAIN OUTCOME(S): Our primary outcomes were delivery, timing, and frequency of physical therapy, as well as ICU LOS. MEASURE(S): Main outcomes were assessed by (1) odds of receiving physical therapy while in the MICU and (2) time from MICU admission to first physical therapist session and (3) ICU LOS. RESULTS: During the intervention, an increased proportion of admits received physical therapy with a nearly 4-fold increase in the odds of receiving physical therapy. Time to first physical therapist session was decreased while the proportion of days with physical therapy in the ICU was increased. In adjusted analysis, ICU LOS decreased modestly. Findings were similar for 3 years post-QI. CONCLUSIONS: Despite variable resources and increased illness severity in the post-intervention period, durable improvements in the percentage of patients receiving physical therapy, odds of receiving physical therapy, time to physical therapy, and proportion of days with physical therapy occurred for 3 years post-QI. Secondarily, the during and post periods were associated with modest reductions in ICU LOS. RELEVANCE: This work is applicable to the fields of: critical care rehabilitation, quality improvement, ICU mobility, and health care delivery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical Therapy
Published
2026-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzag100
Primary Topic
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Sustained Three-Year Impact of a Physical Therapy Quality Improvement Project in the Medical Intensive Care Unit

Megan Watson, Kyle J. Ridgeway, Sarah E. Jolley, William Niehaus et al.
Physical Therapy
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
article

Sustained Three-Year Impact of a Physical Therapy Quality Improvement Project in the Medical Intensive Care Unit

Megan Watson, Kyle J. Ridgeway, Sarah E. Jolley, William Niehaus, Ryan Peterson
article en

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Early rehabilitation and mobility are components of care bundles and clinical practice guidelines for patients who are critically ill. Improved delivery of physical therapy is associated with decreased intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS). Barriers exist to optimizing the delivery of physical therapy. Analyses of quality improvement (QI) are often narrow in scope. Care improvements may not persist. Opportunities remain to improve physical therapy delivery to patients in the medical ICU (MICU) while analyzing care delivery and ICU LOS. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to determine whether a QI initiative sustained improvement in physical therapy delivery and associations with ICU LOS in the MICU. DESIGN: This was a before-during-after comparative design. SETTING: The study took place in the MICU at a quaternary, academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: The study included 13,058 MICU admissions. INTERVENTION(S): The intervention was a multifaceted physical therapy program including multidisciplinary education, physical therapists integrated into multidisciplinary rounds, automatic physical therapist consult orders, electronic health record (EHR) hard stop for bedrest orders, and increased physical therapy staffing including a program coordinator physical therapist. MAIN OUTCOME(S): Our primary outcomes were delivery, timing, and frequency of physical therapy, as well as ICU LOS. MEASURE(S): Main outcomes were assessed by (1) odds of receiving physical therapy while in the MICU and (2) time from MICU admission to first physical therapist session and (3) ICU LOS. RESULTS: During the intervention, an increased proportion of admits received physical therapy with a nearly 4-fold increase in the odds of receiving physical therapy. Time to first physical therapist session was decreased while the proportion of days with physical therapy in the ICU was increased. In adjusted analysis, ICU LOS decreased modestly. Findings were similar for 3 years post-QI. CONCLUSIONS: Despite variable resources and increased illness severity in the post-intervention period, durable improvements in the percentage of patients receiving physical therapy, odds of receiving physical therapy, time to physical therapy, and proportion of days with physical therapy occurred for 3 years post-QI. Secondarily, the during and post periods were associated with modest reductions in ICU LOS. RELEVANCE: This work is applicable to the fields of: critical care rehabilitation, quality improvement, ICU mobility, and health care delivery.

Physical Therapy
University of Iowa (US), University of Colorado Hospital (US), Pulmonary and Allergy Associates (US), University of Colorado Denver (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.