Children’s participation in assent to paediatric oncology research: experiences of children, siblings and parents

Abstract Background Research is essential for improving outcomes in paediatric oncology, yet decisions about research participation often occur during emotionally vulnerable periods for families. Although children’s assent is ethically required, it is not always meaningfully implemented in practice. Understanding how children, siblings and parents experience the child’s involvement in the assent process, including their attitudes towards research, is crucial for promoting ethically sound research and supporting genuine child participation. The aim of this study was to describe how children with cancer, siblings and parents experience the child’s assent process during research recruitment in paediatric oncology, with particular attention to its motivational and relational dimensions. Methods A descriptive qualitative study design. Interviews were undertaken with children with cancer ( n = 11), siblings ( n = 17) and parents ( n = 9) regarding their experiences of recruitment to various types of research in Sweden. Data was analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Results Two main themes were identified: a moral and emotional commitment to research , and relational assent—trust, loyalty and parental mediation. Children, siblings and parents described research participation as meaningful and morally significant in a vulnerable situation. Children’s involvement in assent ranged from active participation to limited influence, with some decisions made primarily by parents. Decisions about research participation were shaped by relational dynamics, in which trust, loyalty, and emotional vulnerability and parental mediation played central roles. Conclusions Families are strongly motivated to contribute to research in paediatric oncology. However, sustaining trust and safeguarding research integrity require consistent and meaningful implementation of children’s assent. Child-centred, flexible, and context-sensitive assent processes are key, alongside ethical awareness of how relational dynamics shape children’s autonomy. Recognising parents as key partners is essential for upholding both ethical standards and children’s rights in paediatric research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Trials
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-026-10011-2
Primary Topic
Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Children’s participation in assent to paediatric oncology research: experiences of children, siblings and parents

Malin Lövgren, Kajsa Norberg Wieslander, Sara Frygner-Holm, Tove Godskesen et al.
Trials
Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
article

Children’s participation in assent to paediatric oncology research: experiences of children, siblings and parents

Malin Lövgren, Kajsa Norberg Wieslander, Sara Frygner-Holm, Tove Godskesen, Anna Höglund, Stefan Nilsson
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Research is essential for improving outcomes in paediatric oncology, yet decisions about research participation often occur during emotionally vulnerable periods for families. Although children’s assent is ethically required, it is not always meaningfully implemented in practice. Understanding how children, siblings and parents experience the child’s involvement in the assent process, including their attitudes towards research, is crucial for promoting ethically sound research and supporting genuine child participation. The aim of this study was to describe how children with cancer, siblings and parents experience the child’s assent process during research recruitment in paediatric oncology, with particular attention to its motivational and relational dimensions. Methods A descriptive qualitative study design. Interviews were undertaken with children with cancer ( n = 11), siblings ( n = 17) and parents ( n = 9) regarding their experiences of recruitment to various types of research in Sweden. Data was analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Results Two main themes were identified: a moral and emotional commitment to research , and relational assent—trust, loyalty and parental mediation. Children, siblings and parents described research participation as meaningful and morally significant in a vulnerable situation. Children’s involvement in assent ranged from active participation to limited influence, with some decisions made primarily by parents. Decisions about research participation were shaped by relational dynamics, in which trust, loyalty, and emotional vulnerability and parental mediation played central roles. Conclusions Families are strongly motivated to contribute to research in paediatric oncology. However, sustaining trust and safeguarding research integrity require consistent and meaningful implementation of children’s assent. Child-centred, flexible, and context-sensitive assent processes are key, alongside ethical awareness of how relational dynamics shape children’s autonomy. Recognising parents as key partners is essential for upholding both ethical standards and children’s rights in paediatric research.

TrialsVol. 27(1)
Uppsala University (SE), Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE), Nord University (NO), Marie Cederschiöld University (SE), University of Gothenburg (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.