Lens Modeling and Cosmological Inference from an Impure Sample of Galaxy-Galaxy Strong Lenses

Abstract The start of the Legacy Survey of Space and Time marks a new era for strong lensing science, where the number of strong lenses identified is expected to increase to ∼100 000. In this paper we use a neural network to determine the precision with which lens parameters can be determined, using realistic simulated LSST lensed systems. We find that the Einstein radius can be measured with a mean precision of 3.7% with calibrated uncertainties accurately reflecting the corresponding measurement error. Based on the performance of current strong lens classifiers, the ∼100, 000 detectable strong lenses are expected to be accompanied by a similar or larger number of false positives (non-lenses). In readiness for this we introduce a formalism, termed ‘COSMIC-BEAMS’, to infer cosmological parameters while accounting for contamination by false positives. As a proof-of-concept, using simulated LSST measurements of the Einstein radii of a realistic and impure sample of photometric lens systems, i.e. those without spectroscopic confirmation, we find that the cosmological parameters Ωm, $\Omega _\Lambda$, and w can be measured to a precision of 0.1, 0.03 and 0.15 respectively for a wCDM cosmology. We demonstrate that unbiased cosmological parameters can be inferred even in strong lens samples contaminated by 50% false positives, and that the photometric dataset of 100 000 strong lenses will provide equivalent w-precision to 2500 − 3500 spectroscopic systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stag2048
Primary Topic
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lens Modeling and Cosmological Inference from an Impure Sample of Galaxy-Galaxy Strong Lenses

Simon Birrer, Philip Holloway, Philip J. Marshall, Thomas E. Collett et al.
1 links
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
article

Lens Modeling and Cosmological Inference from an Impure Sample of Galaxy-Galaxy Strong Lenses

Simon Birrer, Philip Holloway, Philip J. Marshall, Thomas E. Collett, Padma Venkatraman, Steven Dillmann, Sydney Erickson, Aprajita Verma, Tian Li
article en

Abstract

Abstract The start of the Legacy Survey of Space and Time marks a new era for strong lensing science, where the number of strong lenses identified is expected to increase to ∼100 000. In this paper we use a neural network to determine the precision with which lens parameters can be determined, using realistic simulated LSST lensed systems. We find that the Einstein radius can be measured with a mean precision of 3.7% with calibrated uncertainties accurately reflecting the corresponding measurement error. Based on the performance of current strong lens classifiers, the ∼100, 000 detectable strong lenses are expected to be accompanied by a similar or larger number of false positives (non-lenses). In readiness for this we introduce a formalism, termed ‘COSMIC-BEAMS’, to infer cosmological parameters while accounting for contamination by false positives. As a proof-of-concept, using simulated LSST measurements of the Einstein radii of a realistic and impure sample of photometric lens systems, i.e. those without spectroscopic confirmation, we find that the cosmological parameters Ωm, $\Omega _\Lambda$, and w can be measured to a precision of 0.1, 0.03 and 0.15 respectively for a wCDM cosmology. We demonstrate that unbiased cosmological parameters can be inferred even in strong lens samples contaminated by 50% false positives, and that the photometric dataset of 100 000 strong lenses will provide equivalent w-precision to 2500 − 3500 spectroscopic systems.

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), Urbana University (US), SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory (US), University of Oxford (GB), Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology (US), Science Oxford (GB), Stony Brook University (US), University of Portsmouth (GB)
National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Energy, Princeton University, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, Office of Science, Science and Technology Facilities Council, Institut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des Particules, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon