Co-producing principles of engagement to improve the inclusion of black women in UK maternity and neonatal research: a qualitative study

Abstract Background Black women in the United Kingdom persistently experience poor health outcomes in pregnancy and childbirth compared to white women. These healthcare inequities have multiple causalities, and are rooted in intersecting structural, systemic, institutional and sociocultural factors. This is exemplified by the underrepresentation of Black women in healthcare research. Mistrust in research, shaped by historical exploitation and contemporary discrimination, alongside organisational barriers within research delivery, continues to limit equitable research participation. Aim To critically explore how maternity and neonatal research opportunities are offered, understood, and experienced by Black women and research delivery teams, and to co-produce Principles of Engagement (PoE) to support more inclusive research practices. Methods An exploratory qualitative design was employed, informed by the Double Diamond framework. In the discover phase, seven online focus groups were conducted with Black women and community representatives ( n = 26), as well as research midwives ( n = 24). Data was analysed using reflexive thematic analysis to define key themes. These findings, alongside patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) input, and evidence from a recent systematic review, informed the develop phase, generating draft Principles of Engagement. In the deliver phase, these principles were iteratively refined, discussed, and rated through three online consensus workshops with stakeholders ( n = 20). Results Four interrelated themes were generated from the focus groups: (1) Trust as a precondition for ethical participation; (2) Making research inclusive and accessible; (3) Power, agency and relational decision-making; and (4) Motivation and value of participation. During subsequent consensus workshops, eight Principles of Engagement were generated; all eight principles were rated as 100% important in the final consensus round. Conclusion Research engagement was found to be socially negotiated and structurally shaped rather than a solely individual choice. Inclusive intent alone was often insufficient without resourced structural support and relational accountability. Our findings have been translated into novel, co-produced and system-ready principles of engagement which aim to advance equity in UK maternity and neonatal research. Embedding these principles in research practice has the potential to improve trust between clinicians and Black women, widen research participation and improve the fairness, transparency, and relevance of maternity research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-026-03012-x
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Co-producing principles of engagement to improve the inclusion of black women in UK maternity and neonatal research: a qualitative study

Sophie Susannah Hall, Georgia Clancy, Catherine L. Henshall, Shireen Patel et al.
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

Co-producing principles of engagement to improve the inclusion of black women in UK maternity and neonatal research: a qualitative study

Sophie Susannah Hall, Georgia Clancy, Catherine L. Henshall, Shireen Patel, B Majmudar
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Black women in the United Kingdom persistently experience poor health outcomes in pregnancy and childbirth compared to white women. These healthcare inequities have multiple causalities, and are rooted in intersecting structural, systemic, institutional and sociocultural factors. This is exemplified by the underrepresentation of Black women in healthcare research. Mistrust in research, shaped by historical exploitation and contemporary discrimination, alongside organisational barriers within research delivery, continues to limit equitable research participation. Aim To critically explore how maternity and neonatal research opportunities are offered, understood, and experienced by Black women and research delivery teams, and to co-produce Principles of Engagement (PoE) to support more inclusive research practices. Methods An exploratory qualitative design was employed, informed by the Double Diamond framework. In the discover phase, seven online focus groups were conducted with Black women and community representatives ( n = 26), as well as research midwives ( n = 24). Data was analysed using reflexive thematic analysis to define key themes. These findings, alongside patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) input, and evidence from a recent systematic review, informed the develop phase, generating draft Principles of Engagement. In the deliver phase, these principles were iteratively refined, discussed, and rated through three online consensus workshops with stakeholders ( n = 20). Results Four interrelated themes were generated from the focus groups: (1) Trust as a precondition for ethical participation; (2) Making research inclusive and accessible; (3) Power, agency and relational decision-making; and (4) Motivation and value of participation. During subsequent consensus workshops, eight Principles of Engagement were generated; all eight principles were rated as 100% important in the final consensus round. Conclusion Research engagement was found to be socially negotiated and structurally shaped rather than a solely individual choice. Inclusive intent alone was often insufficient without resourced structural support and relational accountability. Our findings have been translated into novel, co-produced and system-ready principles of engagement which aim to advance equity in UK maternity and neonatal research. Embedding these principles in research practice has the potential to improve trust between clinicians and Black women, widen research participation and improve the fairness, transparency, and relevance of maternity research.

BMC Medical Research Methodology
Oxford Brookes University (GB), Department of Health and Social Care (GB), University of Nottingham (GB)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.