SEPARATING DEPRESSION FROM ADHD: IMPROVING GENOMIC LOCUS DISCOVERY AND SPECIFITY IN DSM-DEFINED MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER USING GENOMIC STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELLING

Background GWAS of major depressive disorder (MDD) increasingly rely on minimal phenotyping (e.g., EHR codes, single-item questionnaires), potentially diluting diagnostic specificity. The Identical Depression Phenotype (IDP) consortium meta-analysed harmonised DSM-based MDD assessments to enhance aetiological specificity. Notably, EHR-based MDD shows strong genetic correlations with ADHD that are absent in DSM-defined MDD, suggesting broad phenotyping captures substantial non-MDD liability. Here, we applied Genomic SEM to jointly model DSM-defined MDD alongside broadly defined phenotypes, separating MDD-specific signal from ADHD and other non-specific genetic variance, and systematically evaluated locus-level signal changes between input and output summary statistics. Methods We performed LD clumping on pre- and post-Genomic SEM summary statistics across seven MDD phenotype configurations, including IDP DSM, 23andMe, PGC MDD, and EHR-based definitions. A power-aware attenuation framework classified locus loss as genuine when statistical power exceeded 80% and signal decreased by ≥2 orders of magnitude (−log₁₀p). Results The DSM-defined IDP phenotype showed 80 pre-GSEM loci reduced to 36 post-GSEM, with 22 novel loci emerging and mild attenuation (mean 2.58 −log₁₀p units; 18 of 22 well-powered loci lost). By contrast, the EHR-based phenotype was heavily attenuated (163→34 loci; mean 5.15 units; 64/68 well-powered loci lost), as was the full PGC MDD (699→134; mean 5.83; 309/319 lost). The largest combined model (785→194 loci; 105 novel) lost 332 of 345 well-powered loci (mean 5.44). Across all configurations, broadly defined phenotypes showed consistently greater attenuation than DSM-defined phenotypes. PGS derived from the IDP GWAS explained more variance in African (1.69%) and South Asian (1.73%) ancestry samples than PGS from the larger 23andMe and PGC MDD GWAS, despite substantially smaller discovery sample size. Conclusions DSM-based MDD phenotyping preserves genetic signal through multivariate modelling, whereas broadly defined phenotypes — particularly EHR-based definitions contaminated by ADHD-related liability — show substantial attenuation consistent with capture of non-specific variance. This framework provides a principled approach for separating depression-specific genetic architecture from comorbid psychiatric liability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2026.112985
Primary Topic
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

SEPARATING DEPRESSION FROM ADHD: IMPROVING GENOMIC LOCUS DISCOVERY AND SPECIFITY IN DSM-DEFINED MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER USING GENOMIC STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELLING

Giuseppe Pierpaolo Merola, Madhurbain Singh, Jodi Thomas, Floris Huider et al.
European Neuropsychopharmacology
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
article

SEPARATING DEPRESSION FROM ADHD: IMPROVING GENOMIC LOCUS DISCOVERY AND SPECIFITY IN DSM-DEFINED MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER USING GENOMIC STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELLING

Giuseppe Pierpaolo Merola, Madhurbain Singh, Jodi Thomas, Floris Huider, Jonathan Coleman, Mark Adams, Dorret Boomsma, Brittany Mitchell, Alex Kwong, Gerome Breen, Roseann E. Peterson, Rujia Wang, Andrew McIntosh, Johan Zvrskovec
article en

Abstract

Background GWAS of major depressive disorder (MDD) increasingly rely on minimal phenotyping (e.g., EHR codes, single-item questionnaires), potentially diluting diagnostic specificity. The Identical Depression Phenotype (IDP) consortium meta-analysed harmonised DSM-based MDD assessments to enhance aetiological specificity. Notably, EHR-based MDD shows strong genetic correlations with ADHD that are absent in DSM-defined MDD, suggesting broad phenotyping captures substantial non-MDD liability. Here, we applied Genomic SEM to jointly model DSM-defined MDD alongside broadly defined phenotypes, separating MDD-specific signal from ADHD and other non-specific genetic variance, and systematically evaluated locus-level signal changes between input and output summary statistics. Methods We performed LD clumping on pre- and post-Genomic SEM summary statistics across seven MDD phenotype configurations, including IDP DSM, 23andMe, PGC MDD, and EHR-based definitions. A power-aware attenuation framework classified locus loss as genuine when statistical power exceeded 80% and signal decreased by ≥2 orders of magnitude (−log₁₀p). Results The DSM-defined IDP phenotype showed 80 pre-GSEM loci reduced to 36 post-GSEM, with 22 novel loci emerging and mild attenuation (mean 2.58 −log₁₀p units; 18 of 22 well-powered loci lost). By contrast, the EHR-based phenotype was heavily attenuated (163→34 loci; mean 5.15 units; 64/68 well-powered loci lost), as was the full PGC MDD (699→134; mean 5.83; 309/319 lost). The largest combined model (785→194 loci; 105 novel) lost 332 of 345 well-powered loci (mean 5.44). Across all configurations, broadly defined phenotypes showed consistently greater attenuation than DSM-defined phenotypes. PGS derived from the IDP GWAS explained more variance in African (1.69%) and South Asian (1.73%) ancestry samples than PGS from the larger 23andMe and PGC MDD GWAS, despite substantially smaller discovery sample size. Conclusions DSM-based MDD phenotyping preserves genetic signal through multivariate modelling, whereas broadly defined phenotypes — particularly EHR-based definitions contaminated by ADHD-related liability — show substantial attenuation consistent with capture of non-specific variance. This framework provides a principled approach for separating depression-specific genetic architecture from comorbid psychiatric liability.

European NeuropsychopharmacologyVol. 111
King's College London (GB), Virginia Commonwealth University (US), QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute (AU), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.