Transparent and harmonized allocation factors for crop-processing co-products in U.S. dairy rations

Abstract Purpose Crop-processing co-products are widely used in U.S. dairy rations and contribute substantially to feed supply, yet the allocation factors needed to assign them a share of upstream crop-production burdens are not harmonized across methods or available in a single transparent resource. Methods This study compiled a database of economic, dry-matter mass, and gross energy allocation factors for 62 dairy-relevant co-products from 22 U.S. plant-processing systems, including small grains, oilseeds, sugar crops, vegetables, and specialty crops, derived from explicit equations applied to harmonized inventory data for 2024–2025. Parametric uncertainty was quantified using Monte Carlo simulation with 10,000 iterations per system and Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) distributed inputs for co-product yields, market prices, and gross energy content, and a cross-method divergence index was used to characterize sensitivity to allocation choice. Results and discussion Of the 62 co-products evaluated, 29 were classified as high sensitivity, 22 as moderate, and 11 as low, with the greatest divergence occurring in almond, sweet corn, citrus, peanut, cotton, and safflower systems. For most co-products, variation across allocation methods exceeded parametric uncertainty within any single method, indicating that allocation choice is the main source of methodological variability in co-product environmental assessment. Conclusion The resulting factors are impact-category neutral and designed to interface with any upstream crop life-cycle inventory, complementing rather than replacing allocations already embedded in general-purpose life-cycle inventory databases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-026-02750-w
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Transparent and harmonized allocation factors for crop-processing co-products in U.S. dairy rations

Robin Fishman, Dinesh Gulati, A. J. Purdy, Reza Keshavarz Afshar et al.
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
article

Transparent and harmonized allocation factors for crop-processing co-products in U.S. dairy rations

Robin Fishman, Dinesh Gulati, A. J. Purdy, Reza Keshavarz Afshar, Juan Tricarico, Meetpal S. Kukal, Francisco Medel-Jiménez
article en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Crop-processing co-products are widely used in U.S. dairy rations and contribute substantially to feed supply, yet the allocation factors needed to assign them a share of upstream crop-production burdens are not harmonized across methods or available in a single transparent resource. Methods This study compiled a database of economic, dry-matter mass, and gross energy allocation factors for 62 dairy-relevant co-products from 22 U.S. plant-processing systems, including small grains, oilseeds, sugar crops, vegetables, and specialty crops, derived from explicit equations applied to harmonized inventory data for 2024–2025. Parametric uncertainty was quantified using Monte Carlo simulation with 10,000 iterations per system and Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) distributed inputs for co-product yields, market prices, and gross energy content, and a cross-method divergence index was used to characterize sensitivity to allocation choice. Results and discussion Of the 62 co-products evaluated, 29 were classified as high sensitivity, 22 as moderate, and 11 as low, with the greatest divergence occurring in almond, sweet corn, citrus, peanut, cotton, and safflower systems. For most co-products, variation across allocation methods exceeded parametric uncertainty within any single method, indicating that allocation choice is the main source of methodological variability in co-product environmental assessment. Conclusion The resulting factors are impact-category neutral and designed to interface with any upstream crop life-cycle inventory, complementing rather than replacing allocations already embedded in general-purpose life-cycle inventory databases.

The International Journal of Life Cycle AssessmentVol. 31(10)
Boise State University (US), Ames Research Center (US), California State University, Monterey Bay (US), Dairy Management (US)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.