A cross-species test of cognitive flexibility: Assessing the influence of phrasing cue modality on serial pattern performance in rats (Rattus norvegicus) and humans (Homo sapiens).

The serial multiple choice task is a cross-species model of serial pattern learning that recruits multiple cognitive mechanisms concurrently. The task requires subjects to learn a complex sequence of responses that follow a specific pattern, which is further organized by the placement of distinct cues throughout the sequence. These cues, termed phrasing cues, denote locations in the pattern where response strategy shifts. Although research suggests that phrasing cues facilitate pattern learning, there is a lack of information on how subjects encode these phrasing cues during the pattern learning process. Thus, the current study investigated this further. In this study, rats and humans completed a computerized version of the serial multiple choice task, in which subjects learned a complex serial pattern with either a temporal or spatial phrasing cue. Following acquisition of the pattern, the phrasing cues were then switched between groups to assess if pattern performance could generalize across different phrasing cue modalities. Although both phrasing cues similarly facilitated pattern acquisition, the subsequent cue switch produced performance impairments for both species. These results indicate limits in the cognitive flexibility available during serial pattern learning, as neither humans nor rats appeared to readily abstract the function of the phrasing cue independent of its stimulus characteristics. Instead, subjects encoded the specific stimulus characteristics of the phrasing cue within the pattern as it was learned, somewhat limiting the generalizability of their learned behavior to novel contexts. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of comparative psychology
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000451
Primary Topic
Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

A cross-species test of cognitive flexibility: Assessing the influence of phrasing cue modality on serial pattern performance in rats (Rattus norvegicus) and humans (Homo sapiens).

Stephen B. Fountain, Katherine Dyer, Lucrezia Speranza
Journal of comparative psychology
Memory and Neural Mechanisms
article

A cross-species test of cognitive flexibility: Assessing the influence of phrasing cue modality on serial pattern performance in rats (Rattus norvegicus) and humans (Homo sapiens).

Stephen B. Fountain, Katherine Dyer, Lucrezia Speranza
article en

Abstract

The serial multiple choice task is a cross-species model of serial pattern learning that recruits multiple cognitive mechanisms concurrently. The task requires subjects to learn a complex sequence of responses that follow a specific pattern, which is further organized by the placement of distinct cues throughout the sequence. These cues, termed phrasing cues, denote locations in the pattern where response strategy shifts. Although research suggests that phrasing cues facilitate pattern learning, there is a lack of information on how subjects encode these phrasing cues during the pattern learning process. Thus, the current study investigated this further. In this study, rats and humans completed a computerized version of the serial multiple choice task, in which subjects learned a complex serial pattern with either a temporal or spatial phrasing cue. Following acquisition of the pattern, the phrasing cues were then switched between groups to assess if pattern performance could generalize across different phrasing cue modalities. Although both phrasing cues similarly facilitated pattern acquisition, the subsequent cue switch produced performance impairments for both species. These results indicate limits in the cognitive flexibility available during serial pattern learning, as neither humans nor rats appeared to readily abstract the function of the phrasing cue independent of its stimulus characteristics. Instead, subjects encoded the specific stimulus characteristics of the phrasing cue within the pattern as it was learned, somewhat limiting the generalizability of their learned behavior to novel contexts. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

Journal of comparative psychology
Kent State University (US), Eckerd College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Memory and Neural Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A cross-species test of cognitive flexibility: Assessing the influence of phrasing cue modality on serial pattern performance in rats (Rattus norvegicus) and humans (Homo sapiens). — Stephen B. Fountain, Katherine Dyer, et al. · Journal of comparative psychology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS