Minor lateral pedicle wall breach patterns reduce construct stiffness without substantial stress amplification in posterior pedicle screw fixation

Pedicle screw fixation is widely used to restore spinal stability. However, breaching of the lateral pedicle wall remains a clinically relevant complication associated with screw malposition. Using finite element analysis, this study aimed to evaluate the biomechanical effects of different lateral pedicle wall breach patterns following placement of pedicle screw fixation constructs. A three-dimensional finite element model of the L1–L5 lumbar spine was established and used to simulate one-level posterior fixation at L3–L4. Eleven models were analyzed, including an intact model, a correctly instrumented fixation model, and nine malposition models with different distributions of pedicle screws breaching the lateral pedicle wall. All fixation constructs used titanium alloy pedicle screws and rods. Biomechanical responses were assessed under flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. The maximum von Mises stress in the pedicle and screw, together with the construct stiffness, was compared among the models. Breaching the lateral pedicle wall did not result in a substantial increase in peak stress in the pedicle or screw in most malposition models. In contrast, the construct stiffness was reduced in nearly all breach configurations relative to the correctly instrumented model. The magnitude of stiffness reduction was influenced by both the number and distribution of breached pedicles. Nevertheless, even the least stable malposition model retained over 45% of the stiffness of the correctly instrumented construct. In healthy bone, minor lateral pedicle wall breaches (< 2 mm) did not substantially increase peak pedicle or screw stress under the simulated static loading conditions but could reduce construct stiffness. The magnitude of stiffness reduction depended on both the spatial distribution of the breached screws and the loading direction, with the greatest reductions occurring during lateral bending and axial rotation in selected malposition configurations. These findings indicate that minor lateral breach may preserve substantial residual fixation stiffness, although the results should not be extrapolated to long-term implant failure or clinical stability thresholds.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-72626-4
Primary Topic
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Minor lateral pedicle wall breach patterns reduce construct stiffness without substantial stress amplification in posterior pedicle screw fixation

Yung‐Heng Hsu, Changheng Liu, Ping‐Jui Tsai, Youh-Hua Lo
Scientific Reports
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
article

Minor lateral pedicle wall breach patterns reduce construct stiffness without substantial stress amplification in posterior pedicle screw fixation

Yung‐Heng Hsu, Changheng Liu, Ping‐Jui Tsai, Youh-Hua Lo
article en

Abstract

Pedicle screw fixation is widely used to restore spinal stability. However, breaching of the lateral pedicle wall remains a clinically relevant complication associated with screw malposition. Using finite element analysis, this study aimed to evaluate the biomechanical effects of different lateral pedicle wall breach patterns following placement of pedicle screw fixation constructs. A three-dimensional finite element model of the L1–L5 lumbar spine was established and used to simulate one-level posterior fixation at L3–L4. Eleven models were analyzed, including an intact model, a correctly instrumented fixation model, and nine malposition models with different distributions of pedicle screws breaching the lateral pedicle wall. All fixation constructs used titanium alloy pedicle screws and rods. Biomechanical responses were assessed under flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. The maximum von Mises stress in the pedicle and screw, together with the construct stiffness, was compared among the models. Breaching the lateral pedicle wall did not result in a substantial increase in peak stress in the pedicle or screw in most malposition models. In contrast, the construct stiffness was reduced in nearly all breach configurations relative to the correctly instrumented model. The magnitude of stiffness reduction was influenced by both the number and distribution of breached pedicles. Nevertheless, even the least stable malposition model retained over 45% of the stiffness of the correctly instrumented construct. In healthy bone, minor lateral pedicle wall breaches (< 2 mm) did not substantially increase peak pedicle or screw stress under the simulated static loading conditions but could reduce construct stiffness. The magnitude of stiffness reduction depended on both the spatial distribution of the breached screws and the loading direction, with the greatest reductions occurring during lateral bending and axial rotation in selected malposition configurations. These findings indicate that minor lateral breach may preserve substantial residual fixation stiffness, although the results should not be extrapolated to long-term implant failure or clinical stability thresholds.

Scientific Reports
Chang Gung University (TW), Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (TW)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.