Feasibility and Acceptability of a Co-Designed, Pair-Based Physical Activity Program for Autistic Adults

This study examined the feasibility and acceptability of a co-designed, Behavior Change Wheel-guided, pair-based physical activity (PA) program and explored preliminary changes in PA’s level and motivation. A single-arm trial with pre-, mid-, and post-intervention measurements was conducted. Autistic adults participated with a chosen partner in a 12-week PA program that supported self-determined activities, goals, schedules, self-monitoring, fortnightly check-ins, and regular facilitator support. Outcomes included intervention acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, adherence, and adverse events, as well as study feasibility indicators including consent, eligibility, recruitment, retention, data completeness and analyzability rates. PA and sedentary behavior were assessed using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire–Short Form (IPAQ-SF) and a SENS accelerometer, and PA motivation was assessed using the Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire-3 (BREQ-3). Four dyads enrolled. Participants rated the program as feasible, appropriate, and acceptable. Attendance and adherence exceeded the prespecified benchmark of ≥70%, and no adverse events were reported. One pair opted out of all non-measurement components after Week 1. The consent rate (29.3%) and enrollment eligibility rate (33%) fell below prespecified benchmarks, whereas recruitment and retention were 100%. Measurement completion rates met the benchmark (≥80%) at every time point. Analyzable rates met benchmark for SENS, BREQ-3, and the post-program acceptability/appropriateness/feasibility questionnaire, but not IPAQ-SF. SENS data showed reduced sedentary time and increased low-intensity activity at mid-program, with both returning to baseline at post-program. Most autistic participants showed higher self-determined PA motivation post-program. The program appeared feasible, acceptable, and appropriate for participants, but recruitment and onboarding posed challenges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2026.2733279
Primary Topic
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Feasibility and Acceptability of a Co-Designed, Pair-Based Physical Activity Program for Autistic Adults

Eleanor Quested, Vu Ngoc Duong, Joanne Alexandra McVeigh, Craig K Thompson
Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
article

Feasibility and Acceptability of a Co-Designed, Pair-Based Physical Activity Program for Autistic Adults

Eleanor Quested, Vu Ngoc Duong, Joanne Alexandra McVeigh, Craig K Thompson
article en

Abstract

This study examined the feasibility and acceptability of a co-designed, Behavior Change Wheel-guided, pair-based physical activity (PA) program and explored preliminary changes in PA’s level and motivation. A single-arm trial with pre-, mid-, and post-intervention measurements was conducted. Autistic adults participated with a chosen partner in a 12-week PA program that supported self-determined activities, goals, schedules, self-monitoring, fortnightly check-ins, and regular facilitator support. Outcomes included intervention acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, adherence, and adverse events, as well as study feasibility indicators including consent, eligibility, recruitment, retention, data completeness and analyzability rates. PA and sedentary behavior were assessed using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire–Short Form (IPAQ-SF) and a SENS accelerometer, and PA motivation was assessed using the Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire-3 (BREQ-3). Four dyads enrolled. Participants rated the program as feasible, appropriate, and acceptable. Attendance and adherence exceeded the prespecified benchmark of ≥70%, and no adverse events were reported. One pair opted out of all non-measurement components after Week 1. The consent rate (29.3%) and enrollment eligibility rate (33%) fell below prespecified benchmarks, whereas recruitment and retention were 100%. Measurement completion rates met the benchmark (≥80%) at every time point. Analyzable rates met benchmark for SENS, BREQ-3, and the post-program acceptability/appropriateness/feasibility questionnaire, but not IPAQ-SF. SENS data showed reduced sedentary time and increased low-intensity activity at mid-program, with both returning to baseline at post-program. Most autistic participants showed higher self-determined PA motivation post-program. The program appeared feasible, acceptable, and appropriate for participants, but recruitment and onboarding posed challenges.

Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport
Curtin University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.