Fourfold higher graft failure risk with isolated BPTB versus hamstring ACL reconstruction with ALL in patients under 25 years: A prespecified subgroup analysis of a randomized controlled trial

Abstract Purpose To compare 5‐year graft failure rates between isolated bone–patellar tendon–bone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (BPTB‐ACLR) and hamstring tendon (HT)‐ACLR combined with anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR) in patients younger than 25 years. Methods A prespecified subgroup analysis was performed on patients younger than 25 years enroled in a prospective comparative study. Patients underwent either isolated ACLR using a BPTB‐ACLR or hamstring ACLR combined with ALLR (HT‐ACLR + ALLR). The primary outcome was graft failure at 5 years. Secondary outcomes included patient‐reported outcome measures (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS], International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC], Lysholm and Tegner scores). Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan–Meier estimates and log‐rank testing. Multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify independent risk factors for graft failure. Results The analysis included 281 patients younger than 25 years, with 134 undergoing isolated BPTB‐ACLR and 147 undergoing HT‐ACLR + ALLR. At 5 years, graft failure occurred in 22 patients (16.4%) in the isolated BPTB‐ACLR group and in 7 patients (4.8%) in the HT‐ACLR + ALLR group ( p = 0.0013). Kaplan–Meier analysis demonstrated significantly improved graft survival in the HT‐ACLR + ALLR group (log‐rank p = 0.0008). On multivariate analysis, isolated BPTB‐ACLR was independently associated with a higher risk of graft failure compared with HT‐ACLR + ALLR (odds ratio 4.2; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8–11.3; p = 0.0007; hazard ratio 4.2; 95% CI 1.9–10.7; p = 0.0002). Clinical outcome scores were comparable between groups at follow‐up across all patient‐reported measures. Conclusion This secondary analysis of a RCT with 5‐year follow‐up showed that, in patients younger than 25 years, HT‐ACLR combined with ALLR was associated with a significantly lower risk of graft failure compared with isolated BPTB‐ACLR, whereas patient‐reported clinical outcomes were comparable between groups. Level of Evidence Level I, randomized controlled trial.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.70617
Primary Topic
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Fourfold higher graft failure risk with isolated BPTB versus hamstring ACL reconstruction with ALL in patients under 25 years: A prespecified subgroup analysis of a randomized controlled trial

Charles Pioger, Thaïs Dutra Vieira, Jean‐Marie Fayard, Fabio Santamaria et al.
Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
article

Fourfold higher graft failure risk with isolated BPTB versus hamstring ACL reconstruction with ALL in patients under 25 years: A prespecified subgroup analysis of a randomized controlled trial

Charles Pioger, Thaïs Dutra Vieira, Jean‐Marie Fayard, Fabio Santamaria, Mathieu Thaunat, Bertrand Sonnery‐Cottet, Victor Sonnery‐Cottet, Alessandro Carrozzo
article en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose To compare 5‐year graft failure rates between isolated bone–patellar tendon–bone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (BPTB‐ACLR) and hamstring tendon (HT)‐ACLR combined with anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR) in patients younger than 25 years. Methods A prespecified subgroup analysis was performed on patients younger than 25 years enroled in a prospective comparative study. Patients underwent either isolated ACLR using a BPTB‐ACLR or hamstring ACLR combined with ALLR (HT‐ACLR + ALLR). The primary outcome was graft failure at 5 years. Secondary outcomes included patient‐reported outcome measures (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS], International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC], Lysholm and Tegner scores). Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan–Meier estimates and log‐rank testing. Multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify independent risk factors for graft failure. Results The analysis included 281 patients younger than 25 years, with 134 undergoing isolated BPTB‐ACLR and 147 undergoing HT‐ACLR + ALLR. At 5 years, graft failure occurred in 22 patients (16.4%) in the isolated BPTB‐ACLR group and in 7 patients (4.8%) in the HT‐ACLR + ALLR group ( p = 0.0013). Kaplan–Meier analysis demonstrated significantly improved graft survival in the HT‐ACLR + ALLR group (log‐rank p = 0.0008). On multivariate analysis, isolated BPTB‐ACLR was independently associated with a higher risk of graft failure compared with HT‐ACLR + ALLR (odds ratio 4.2; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8–11.3; p = 0.0007; hazard ratio 4.2; 95% CI 1.9–10.7; p = 0.0002). Clinical outcome scores were comparable between groups at follow‐up across all patient‐reported measures. Conclusion This secondary analysis of a RCT with 5‐year follow‐up showed that, in patients younger than 25 years, HT‐ACLR combined with ALLR was associated with a significantly lower risk of graft failure compared with isolated BPTB‐ACLR, whereas patient‐reported clinical outcomes were comparable between groups. Level of Evidence Level I, randomized controlled trial.

Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy
Hôpital Ambroise-Paré (FR), Centre Orthopédique Santy (FR), Link Campus University (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.