Leveraging Human Rights Frameworks for Agentic AI Governance

Abstract Agentic artificial intelligence (AI)—systems that reason, act, and interact with autonomy and persistence—presents qualitatively new governance challenges compared to traditional large language models. By operating across multimodal environments and pursuing goals without constant human input, agentic AI introduces both opportunities to advance human rights and risks of opaque, distributed responsibility for harms. This paper argues that the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) provide a practical foundation for governing agentic AI. We reinterpret the Protect–Respect–Remedy pillars to map onto agentic capacities: reasoning requires anticipatory due diligence; acting demands safeguards and oversight; and interacting calls for transparency, remedy, and accountability. We propose shared responsibility frameworks, grounded in interoperability standards, ongoing monitoring, and redress mechanisms, as essential governance tools. Ultimately, embedding human rights frameworks into the design and deployment of agentic AI enables both risk mitigation and the active promotion of rights in complex, multi-actor ecosystems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business and Human Rights Journal
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/bhj.2026.10055
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Leveraging Human Rights Frameworks for Agentic AI Governance

Shahla Naimi, Angeline Lee
Business and Human Rights Journal
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Leveraging Human Rights Frameworks for Agentic AI Governance

Shahla Naimi, Angeline Lee
article en

Abstract

Abstract Agentic artificial intelligence (AI)—systems that reason, act, and interact with autonomy and persistence—presents qualitatively new governance challenges compared to traditional large language models. By operating across multimodal environments and pursuing goals without constant human input, agentic AI introduces both opportunities to advance human rights and risks of opaque, distributed responsibility for harms. This paper argues that the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) provide a practical foundation for governing agentic AI. We reinterpret the Protect–Respect–Remedy pillars to map onto agentic capacities: reasoning requires anticipatory due diligence; acting demands safeguards and oversight; and interacting calls for transparency, remedy, and accountability. We propose shared responsibility frameworks, grounded in interoperability standards, ongoing monitoring, and redress mechanisms, as essential governance tools. Ultimately, embedding human rights frameworks into the design and deployment of agentic AI enables both risk mitigation and the active promotion of rights in complex, multi-actor ecosystems.

Business and Human Rights Journal
Salesforce (United States) (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.