Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in the Context of Hemophilia: A Scope Review

INTRODUCTION: Advances in hemophilia treatment have improved life expectancy, yet challenges remain in disease management, predicting clinical complications, and optimizing healthcare resources. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have emerged as promising tools to support clinical decision-making and personalized care. OBJECTIVES: To map the available evidence on AI and ML applications in hemophilia and summarize their contributions to clinical practice. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and reported according to PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Electronic databases were searched for studies published between January 2014 and December 2024. Two independent reviewers selected studies using predefined eligibility criteria. RESULTS: A total of 904 records were identified, with 98 duplicates removed. After title and abstract screening, 17 studies underwent full-text assessment. Eight were unavailable in full text, and five did not meet the criteria, resulting in four included studies. AI/ML applications included identification of hemophilia A cases in administrative databases, ultrasound-assisted diagnosis of hemarthrosis and synovitis, prediction of disease severity based on F8 gene mutations, and prediction of adverse clinical outcomes. Frequently used algorithms were Random Forest, support vector machines (SVM), logistic regression, convolutional neural networks, XGBoost, and CatBoost. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic models showed high predictive performance, whereas models for adverse outcomes demonstrated limited generalizability due to small and heterogeneous datasets. AI/ML have substantial potential to improve diagnosis, risk stratification, and personalized management in hemophilia. However, methodological heterogeneity, limited external validation, and the scarcity of studies, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, remain important barriers to routine clinical implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Haemophilia
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/hae.70405
Primary Topic
Hemophilia Treatment and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in the Context of Hemophilia: A Scope Review

Tatyane Oliveira Rebouças, L. D. M. Da Silva, Cicera Jamille Caldas Rodrigues, André Cardoso Tavares et al.
Haemophilia
Hemophilia Treatment and Research
article

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in the Context of Hemophilia: A Scope Review

Tatyane Oliveira Rebouças, L. D. M. Da Silva, Cicera Jamille Caldas Rodrigues, André Cardoso Tavares, Antônio Diego Costa
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Advances in hemophilia treatment have improved life expectancy, yet challenges remain in disease management, predicting clinical complications, and optimizing healthcare resources. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have emerged as promising tools to support clinical decision-making and personalized care. OBJECTIVES: To map the available evidence on AI and ML applications in hemophilia and summarize their contributions to clinical practice. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and reported according to PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Electronic databases were searched for studies published between January 2014 and December 2024. Two independent reviewers selected studies using predefined eligibility criteria. RESULTS: A total of 904 records were identified, with 98 duplicates removed. After title and abstract screening, 17 studies underwent full-text assessment. Eight were unavailable in full text, and five did not meet the criteria, resulting in four included studies. AI/ML applications included identification of hemophilia A cases in administrative databases, ultrasound-assisted diagnosis of hemarthrosis and synovitis, prediction of disease severity based on F8 gene mutations, and prediction of adverse clinical outcomes. Frequently used algorithms were Random Forest, support vector machines (SVM), logistic regression, convolutional neural networks, XGBoost, and CatBoost. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic models showed high predictive performance, whereas models for adverse outcomes demonstrated limited generalizability due to small and heterogeneous datasets. AI/ML have substantial potential to improve diagnosis, risk stratification, and personalized management in hemophilia. However, methodological heterogeneity, limited external validation, and the scarcity of studies, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, remain important barriers to routine clinical implementation.

Haemophilia
Universidade Estadual do Ceará (BR), Fundação Hemopa (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Hemophilia Treatment and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.