Impact of age on procedural and clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for coronary chronic total occlusion: a retrospective single-center study

Background and purpose: The influence of age on procedural success and clinical outcomes in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO) is controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of age on procedural success and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing CTO-PCI. Methods: A total of 1,348 CTO-PCIs performed in 1,283 patients between 2019 and 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were stratified by age. Outcomes included technical success, procedural success, procedural complications, and in-hospital clinical events. Results: Among the 1,283 patients, the mean age was 60.5 ± 11.5 years, and 1,113 (86.7%) were men. Overall technical and procedural success rates were 81.8% and 80.9%, respectively. Age >65 years was associated with a lower procedural success rate (82.7% vs. 77.7%, P = 0.023) and a higher rate of in-hospital adverse events (0.8% vs. 1.4%, P = 0.036). However, the technical success rate and procedural complications were comparable. Conclusions: Age was not associated with technical success in CTO-PCI. However, older age was associated with lower procedural success, potentially because of the higher in-hospital adverse event rates following the procedure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cardiology Plus
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/cp9.0000000000000171
Primary Topic
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Impact of age on procedural and clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for coronary chronic total occlusion: a retrospective single-center study

Bo Ma, Lei Ge, Hao Lü, Xin Zhong et al.
Cardiology Plus
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
article

Impact of age on procedural and clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for coronary chronic total occlusion: a retrospective single-center study

Bo Ma, Lei Ge, Hao Lü, Xin Zhong, Jianying Ma, Tingting Yang, Xin Deng
article en

Abstract

Background and purpose: The influence of age on procedural success and clinical outcomes in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO) is controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of age on procedural success and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing CTO-PCI. Methods: A total of 1,348 CTO-PCIs performed in 1,283 patients between 2019 and 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were stratified by age. Outcomes included technical success, procedural success, procedural complications, and in-hospital clinical events. Results: Among the 1,283 patients, the mean age was 60.5 ± 11.5 years, and 1,113 (86.7%) were men. Overall technical and procedural success rates were 81.8% and 80.9%, respectively. Age >65 years was associated with a lower procedural success rate (82.7% vs. 77.7%, P = 0.023) and a higher rate of in-hospital adverse events (0.8% vs. 1.4%, P = 0.036). However, the technical success rate and procedural complications were comparable. Conclusions: Age was not associated with technical success in CTO-PCI. However, older age was associated with lower procedural success, potentially because of the higher in-hospital adverse event rates following the procedure.

Cardiology Plus
Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Fudan University (CN), Soochow University (CN), National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases (CN), Zhongshan Hospital (CN), The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Shanghai Institute of Hematology (CN), Changzhou No.2 People's Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.