Expanding the ESMO-MCBS: integrating organ preservation into clinical benefit assessment in rectal cancer

We are writing to address the current application of the ESMO Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (MCBS) in the specific context of rectal cancer. The MCBS is a widely adopted framework for assessing clinical benefit in oncology that has improved the comparability across trials by focusing on robust study endpoints, such as disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS),1 but it does not fully capture clinically meaningful benefits specific to rectal cancer—particularly organ preservation. We therefore believe there is an opportunity for further refinement of this scoring system, in light of evolving multimodal treatment strategies in rectal cancer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmogo.2026.100417
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Expanding the ESMO-MCBS: integrating organ preservation into clinical benefit assessment in rectal cancer

Lukas Weiß, Gerald W. Prager, Falk Roeder, Elisabeth Sophie Bergen et al.
ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
article

Expanding the ESMO-MCBS: integrating organ preservation into clinical benefit assessment in rectal cancer

Lukas Weiß, Gerald W. Prager, Falk Roeder, Elisabeth Sophie Bergen, G. Piringer, F. Aigner
article en

Abstract

We are writing to address the current application of the ESMO Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (MCBS) in the specific context of rectal cancer. The MCBS is a widely adopted framework for assessing clinical benefit in oncology that has improved the comparability across trials by focusing on robust study endpoints, such as disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS),1 but it does not fully capture clinically meaningful benefits specific to rectal cancer—particularly organ preservation. We therefore believe there is an opportunity for further refinement of this scoring system, in light of evolving multimodal treatment strategies in rectal cancer.

ESMO Gastrointestinal OncologyVol. 14
Johannes Kepler University of Linz (AT), Paracelsus Medical University (AT), Kepler Universitätsklinikum (AT), Hospital of the Brothers of St. John of God (AT), Austrian Breast & Colorectal Cancer Study Group (AT), Medical University of Vienna (AT)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Expanding the ESMO-MCBS: integrating organ preservation into clinical benefit assessment in rectal cancer — Lukas Weiß, Gerald W. Prager, et al. · ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS