A Critical Review of Critical Thinking in HCI Research About AI

The importance of critical thinking when using generative AI in personal, professional, and educational contexts is widely acknowledged by scholars, educators, and politicians. There are contradictory hypotheses regarding the influence of AI on critical thinking, and research thus far has produced mixed results. In this paper, we present a critical scoping review of 80 research papers from Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) that study critical thinking with or about AI, focusing on how “critical thinking” is defined, measured, and how the papers claim critical thinking to be influenced by AI, according to current HCI research. Our findings demonstrate that critical thinking is rarely defined in HCI research about AI, and there are fundamental construct and criterion validity challenges in this line of research. We present a research agenda for more theory-grounded empirical research in critical thinking with or about AI, based on cognitive-psychological, philosophical, or educational research traditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2026.2722522
Primary Topic
Teaching and Learning Programming
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

A Critical Review of Critical Thinking in HCI Research About AI

Morten Misfeldt, Peter Dalsgaard, Anne Marie Kristensen, Nanna Inie
International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
Teaching and Learning Programming
article

A Critical Review of Critical Thinking in HCI Research About AI

Morten Misfeldt, Peter Dalsgaard, Anne Marie Kristensen, Nanna Inie
article en

Abstract

The importance of critical thinking when using generative AI in personal, professional, and educational contexts is widely acknowledged by scholars, educators, and politicians. There are contradictory hypotheses regarding the influence of AI on critical thinking, and research thus far has produced mixed results. In this paper, we present a critical scoping review of 80 research papers from Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) that study critical thinking with or about AI, focusing on how “critical thinking” is defined, measured, and how the papers claim critical thinking to be influenced by AI, according to current HCI research. Our findings demonstrate that critical thinking is rarely defined in HCI research about AI, and there are fundamental construct and criterion validity challenges in this line of research. We present a research agenda for more theory-grounded empirical research in critical thinking with or about AI, based on cognitive-psychological, philosophical, or educational research traditions.

International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
University of Copenhagen (DK), Aarhus University (DK), IT University of Copenhagen (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Teaching and Learning Programming
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Critical Review of Critical Thinking in HCI Research About AI — Morten Misfeldt, Peter Dalsgaard, et al. · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS