Effects of suspension training and bodyweight resistance training on neuromuscular power, sprint, and agility performance in untrained male adolescents: a three-arm randomized controlled trial

This study compared suspension training (ST) and bodyweight resistance training (RT) with a control condition (CON) for physical performance in untrained male adolescents. Seventy-two participants (age 14.74 ± 0.32 years) were randomized equally to ST, RT, or CON. One participant in RT withdrew because of illness unrelated to the intervention; the participant’s individual data were unavailable. The per-protocol/complete-case analysis therefore included 71 participants (ST n = 24, RT n = 23, CON n = 24), and an intention-to-treat analysis could not be performed. CMJ was the primary outcome; MBT, 30-m sprint, and T-Agility were secondary outcomes. Primary between-group inference used separate baseline-adjusted ANCOVA models for each outcome, followed by three prespecified contrasts with Holm correction within outcome. Mixed ANOVA Group × Time interactions were secondary analyses. The overall ANCOVA group effect was significant for CMJ (F(2,67) = 29.162, p < 0.001, partial η²=0.4654), MBT (F(2,67) = 3.572, p = 0.034, partial η²=0.0964), and 30-m sprint (F(2,67) = 12.090, p < 0.001, partial η²=0.2652), but not T-Agility (F(2,67) = 1.304, p = 0.278, partial η²=0.0375). Holm-adjusted contrasts favored ST versus CON for CMJ (adjusted MD 4.822 cm, 95% familywise simultaneous CI 3.198 to 6.445, p < 0.001) and sprint (adjusted MD -0.200 s, simultaneous CI -0.302 to -0.099, p < 0.001), and RT versus CON for CMJ (adjusted MD 3.710 cm, simultaneous CI 2.072 to 5.348, p < 0.001) and sprint (adjusted MD -0.127 s, simultaneous CI -0.230 to -0.024, p = 0.007). ST and RT did not differ significantly. Although the MBT omnibus test was significant, none of its three contrasts remained significant after Holm correction; no T-Agility contrast was significant. In this PP/complete-case population, both ST and RT produced additional baseline-adjusted improvements in CMJ and 30-m sprint performance relative to CON. No additional T-Agility improvement relative to CON was detected, and the MBT pairwise evidence did not survive Holm correction. The randomized controlled trial was retrospectively registered on 04/23/2026 at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2600123279; https://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojEN.html?proj=316060).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-026-02106-9
Primary Topic
Children's Physical and Motor Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Effects of suspension training and bodyweight resistance training on neuromuscular power, sprint, and agility performance in untrained male adolescents: a three-arm randomized controlled trial

Alexios Batrakoulis, Yong Yang, Mingyue Sun, Weiqiang Xu et al.
BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation
Children's Physical and Motor Development
article

Effects of suspension training and bodyweight resistance training on neuromuscular power, sprint, and agility performance in untrained male adolescents: a three-arm randomized controlled trial

Alexios Batrakoulis, Yong Yang, Mingyue Sun, Weiqiang Xu, Yu Wang
article en

Abstract

This study compared suspension training (ST) and bodyweight resistance training (RT) with a control condition (CON) for physical performance in untrained male adolescents. Seventy-two participants (age 14.74 ± 0.32 years) were randomized equally to ST, RT, or CON. One participant in RT withdrew because of illness unrelated to the intervention; the participant’s individual data were unavailable. The per-protocol/complete-case analysis therefore included 71 participants (ST n = 24, RT n = 23, CON n = 24), and an intention-to-treat analysis could not be performed. CMJ was the primary outcome; MBT, 30-m sprint, and T-Agility were secondary outcomes. Primary between-group inference used separate baseline-adjusted ANCOVA models for each outcome, followed by three prespecified contrasts with Holm correction within outcome. Mixed ANOVA Group × Time interactions were secondary analyses. The overall ANCOVA group effect was significant for CMJ (F(2,67) = 29.162, p < 0.001, partial η²=0.4654), MBT (F(2,67) = 3.572, p = 0.034, partial η²=0.0964), and 30-m sprint (F(2,67) = 12.090, p < 0.001, partial η²=0.2652), but not T-Agility (F(2,67) = 1.304, p = 0.278, partial η²=0.0375). Holm-adjusted contrasts favored ST versus CON for CMJ (adjusted MD 4.822 cm, 95% familywise simultaneous CI 3.198 to 6.445, p < 0.001) and sprint (adjusted MD -0.200 s, simultaneous CI -0.302 to -0.099, p < 0.001), and RT versus CON for CMJ (adjusted MD 3.710 cm, simultaneous CI 2.072 to 5.348, p < 0.001) and sprint (adjusted MD -0.127 s, simultaneous CI -0.230 to -0.024, p = 0.007). ST and RT did not differ significantly. Although the MBT omnibus test was significant, none of its three contrasts remained significant after Holm correction; no T-Agility contrast was significant. In this PP/complete-case population, both ST and RT produced additional baseline-adjusted improvements in CMJ and 30-m sprint performance relative to CON. No additional T-Agility improvement relative to CON was detected, and the MBT pairwise evidence did not survive Holm correction. The randomized controlled trial was retrospectively registered on 04/23/2026 at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2600123279; https://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojEN.html?proj=316060).

BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation
Democritus University of Thrace (GR), European University Cyprus (CY), Chengdu Sport University (CN), Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport (PL), Beijing City University (CN), Beijing Sport University (CN), Tsinghua University (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Children's Physical and Motor Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.