Comparison of EPS Extraction Methods Across Wastewater Sludge Matrices: Recovery Performance and Potential Extraction-Induced Cellular Material Release

Extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) play an important role in wastewater sludge structure and stability, yet measured EPS concentrations depend strongly on the extraction method. This study compared three established protocols (thermal sodium carbonate, thermal sodium chloride, and chemical formamide–NaOH extraction) across activated sludge (AS), aerobic granular sludge (AGS), algal–bacterial granular sludge (ABGS), and an AGS–membrane bioreactor (AGS-MBR). Proteins (PN) and polysaccharides (PS) were quantified in soluble, loosely bound, and tightly bound EPS fractions, with total EPS defined as PN + PS. Sodium carbonate consistently produced the highest apparent PN, PS, and total EPS recoveries across the sludge matrices, while sodium chloride and chemical extraction generally produced lower and comparable recoveries. Because the protocols differed in reagent chemistry, temperature, incubation time, and centrifugation conditions, these differences cannot be attributed to a single extraction parameter. A complementary Escherichia coli experiment showed that adding intact cells to an autoclaved-sludge background altered subsequent polymer recovery during sodium carbonate extraction, suggesting a potential contribution of cellular-associated material; however, PN and PS measurements cannot directly demonstrate cell lysis. Overall, extraction-method selection should consider both recovery performance and potential extraction-induced cellular contributions when interpreting and comparing EPS measurements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/w18182355
Primary Topic
Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Comparison of EPS Extraction Methods Across Wastewater Sludge Matrices: Recovery Performance and Potential Extraction-Induced Cellular Material Release

Rania Hamza, Martina Hausner, Nada Hosni, Kaitlyn Burchill et al.
Water
Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
article

Comparison of EPS Extraction Methods Across Wastewater Sludge Matrices: Recovery Performance and Potential Extraction-Induced Cellular Material Release

Rania Hamza, Martina Hausner, Nada Hosni, Kaitlyn Burchill, Tiaan Sonnenberg
article en

Abstract

Extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) play an important role in wastewater sludge structure and stability, yet measured EPS concentrations depend strongly on the extraction method. This study compared three established protocols (thermal sodium carbonate, thermal sodium chloride, and chemical formamide–NaOH extraction) across activated sludge (AS), aerobic granular sludge (AGS), algal–bacterial granular sludge (ABGS), and an AGS–membrane bioreactor (AGS-MBR). Proteins (PN) and polysaccharides (PS) were quantified in soluble, loosely bound, and tightly bound EPS fractions, with total EPS defined as PN + PS. Sodium carbonate consistently produced the highest apparent PN, PS, and total EPS recoveries across the sludge matrices, while sodium chloride and chemical extraction generally produced lower and comparable recoveries. Because the protocols differed in reagent chemistry, temperature, incubation time, and centrifugation conditions, these differences cannot be attributed to a single extraction parameter. A complementary Escherichia coli experiment showed that adding intact cells to an autoclaved-sludge background altered subsequent polymer recovery during sodium carbonate extraction, suggesting a potential contribution of cellular-associated material; however, PN and PS measurements cannot directly demonstrate cell lysis. Overall, extraction-method selection should consider both recovery performance and potential extraction-induced cellular contributions when interpreting and comparing EPS measurements.

WaterVol. 18(18)
Toronto Metropolitan University (CA)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison of EPS Extraction Methods Across Wastewater Sludge Matrices: Recovery Performance and Potential Extraction-Induced Cellular Material Release — Rania Hamza, Martina Hausner, et al. · Water (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS