Towards a Uniform Interpretation of the Scope and Effects of EU Legal Tender in B2C Transactions

Consumers are increasingly faced with unilateral exclusions of legal tender banknotes and coins in B2C transactions. While Member States diverge on whether legal tender may be refused based on national contract law, such fragmentation hinders the adoption of a uniform EU interpretation. Based on a textual and systematic analysis of EU law, this article advances a uniform interpretation of the scope and effects of legal tender and examines to what extent freedom of contract may impose limitations on the mandatory acceptance of legal tender. It argues that consumers enjoy a subjective right to enforce the acceptance of legal tender unless refusals are objectively justified. Unilateral exclusions of legal tender, such as ‘no cash’ policies, are considered non-binding on consumers. The article argues that this interpretation constitutes a legitimate restriction on the freedom of contract of businesses protected under Article 16 CFR, requiring national courts to disapply conflicting national contract law provisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263x261490698
Primary Topic
European and International Contract Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Towards a Uniform Interpretation of the Scope and Effects of EU Legal Tender in B2C Transactions

Zeno Vanhoyland
Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law
European and International Contract Law
article

Towards a Uniform Interpretation of the Scope and Effects of EU Legal Tender in B2C Transactions

Zeno Vanhoyland
article en

Abstract

Consumers are increasingly faced with unilateral exclusions of legal tender banknotes and coins in B2C transactions. While Member States diverge on whether legal tender may be refused based on national contract law, such fragmentation hinders the adoption of a uniform EU interpretation. Based on a textual and systematic analysis of EU law, this article advances a uniform interpretation of the scope and effects of legal tender and examines to what extent freedom of contract may impose limitations on the mandatory acceptance of legal tender. It argues that consumers enjoy a subjective right to enforce the acceptance of legal tender unless refusals are objectively justified. Unilateral exclusions of legal tender, such as ‘no cash’ policies, are considered non-binding on consumers. The article argues that this interpretation constitutes a legitimate restriction on the freedom of contract of businesses protected under Article 16 CFR, requiring national courts to disapply conflicting national contract law provisions.

Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law
KU Leuven (BE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
European and International Contract Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Towards a Uniform Interpretation of the Scope and Effects of EU Legal Tender in B2C Transactions — Zeno Vanhoyland · Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS