Where is the love? The anthropomorphism paradox in human-AI intimacy

The advanced language capabilities of large language models (LLMs) have intensified humans’ tendency to anthropomorphize technology. This research takes an interactional, processual approach to examine human-AI intimacy. We introduce the “anthropomorphism paradox,” arguing that while anthropomorphic design effectively cultivates emotional attachment, it concurrently elevates user desire for genuine reciprocity and evolving mutual understanding, which current AI cannot meet. This mismatch between humans’ evolving, relational interpretation of intimacy and AI’s preset, simulated logic ultimately leads to communication breakdown and even disengagement. Our study, using observational data and interviews with 20 users (including a 6-month follow-up), shows how this paradox drives both initial attraction and attachment, as well as eventual dissolution, in human-AI romantic relationships. This research extends symbolic interactionism and the performative nature of human-LLM chatbot intimacy. Ultimately, AI’s viability as an enduring emotional companion is challenged by its inherent generative logic, which is not yet equipped to adapt to the evolving nature of human intimacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chinese Sociological Review
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/21620555.2026.2735006
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Where is the love? The anthropomorphism paradox in human-AI intimacy

Huiyi Wang, Muzhi Zhou, Jia Xin Liao
Chinese Sociological Review
AI in Service Interactions
article

Where is the love? The anthropomorphism paradox in human-AI intimacy

Huiyi Wang, Muzhi Zhou, Jia Xin Liao
article en

Abstract

The advanced language capabilities of large language models (LLMs) have intensified humans’ tendency to anthropomorphize technology. This research takes an interactional, processual approach to examine human-AI intimacy. We introduce the “anthropomorphism paradox,” arguing that while anthropomorphic design effectively cultivates emotional attachment, it concurrently elevates user desire for genuine reciprocity and evolving mutual understanding, which current AI cannot meet. This mismatch between humans’ evolving, relational interpretation of intimacy and AI’s preset, simulated logic ultimately leads to communication breakdown and even disengagement. Our study, using observational data and interviews with 20 users (including a 6-month follow-up), shows how this paradox drives both initial attraction and attachment, as well as eventual dissolution, in human-AI romantic relationships. This research extends symbolic interactionism and the performative nature of human-LLM chatbot intimacy. Ultimately, AI’s viability as an enduring emotional companion is challenged by its inherent generative logic, which is not yet equipped to adapt to the evolving nature of human intimacy.

Chinese Sociological Review
Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK), Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK), The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou) (CN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
AI in Service Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.