BUILDING BETTER PHENOTYPES: MEASURING ANTIDEPRESSANT TREATMENT RESPONSE USING ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS

Linkage to electronic health records provides an important opportunity for examining the genetics of depression and treatment on a population scale. While depression diagnoses are identified using clinical coding schemes, symptoms and treatment regimens are often not systematically recorded. This makes tracing treatment response difficult, despite the volume of data available. In the AMBER project, we are enabling large-scale studies of antidepressant treatment response by using electronic health record data to build better phenotypes. Working with clinical and lived experience experts, we have produced several treatment response phenotypes – including maintenance, treatment resistance, and discontinuation – using both structured (clinical coded) data and unstructured (clinical text) data. In structured work, we combine features extracted from routinely-collected prescribing and dispensing records. In unstructured work, we use natural language processing to extract features of interest from primary care clinical notes. We highlight each of the phenotypes, the methods used to produce them and the datasets they have been developed for. We also discuss the contributions of structured and unstructured data to each phenotype, relative to the difficulty of access and use of the data for research. Future work will focus on combining structured and unstructured methods to improve phenotyping, validating phenotypes in other datasets, and examining links with biology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2026.112967
Primary Topic
Mental Health via Writing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

BUILDING BETTER PHENOTYPES: MEASURING ANTIDEPRESSANT TREATMENT RESPONSE USING ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS

Matúš Falis, Heather Whalley, Emily Ball, Arlene Casey et al.
European Neuropsychopharmacology
Mental Health via Writing
article

BUILDING BETTER PHENOTYPES: MEASURING ANTIDEPRESSANT TREATMENT RESPONSE USING ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS

Matúš Falis, Heather Whalley, Emily Ball, Arlene Casey, Matthew Iveson
article en

Abstract

Linkage to electronic health records provides an important opportunity for examining the genetics of depression and treatment on a population scale. While depression diagnoses are identified using clinical coding schemes, symptoms and treatment regimens are often not systematically recorded. This makes tracing treatment response difficult, despite the volume of data available. In the AMBER project, we are enabling large-scale studies of antidepressant treatment response by using electronic health record data to build better phenotypes. Working with clinical and lived experience experts, we have produced several treatment response phenotypes – including maintenance, treatment resistance, and discontinuation – using both structured (clinical coded) data and unstructured (clinical text) data. In structured work, we combine features extracted from routinely-collected prescribing and dispensing records. In unstructured work, we use natural language processing to extract features of interest from primary care clinical notes. We highlight each of the phenotypes, the methods used to produce them and the datasets they have been developed for. We also discuss the contributions of structured and unstructured data to each phenotype, relative to the difficulty of access and use of the data for research. Future work will focus on combining structured and unstructured methods to improve phenotyping, validating phenotypes in other datasets, and examining links with biology.

European NeuropsychopharmacologyVol. 111
University of Edinburgh (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Mental Health via Writing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.