Social stigma, recidivism, and the legal framework of reintegration: A global comparative study of post-release legal systems
This manuscript examines the interrelationship between social stigma, recidivism, and legal frameworks shaping the reintegration of formerly incarcerated individuals. It does so through a comparative analysis of post-release systems in Saudi Arabia, Canada, Germany, and the United States. It highlights how legal restrictions and societal stigma limit access to housing, employment, and healthcare. These limitations impede successful community reintegration and increase the risk of reoffending. The research considers community-based interventions, such as Circles of Support and Accountability (COSA), as mechanisms for reducing recidivism among highly stigmatized groups. This study applies a triadic analytical framework—integrating legal structural, social stigma, and psychosocial adaptation theories—to compare four jurisdictions representing distinct legal traditions. This offers a replicable model for cross-national reintegration research. It emphasizes the need for a comprehensive, integrated approach that combines legal reform with social policies addressing stigma reduction and sustainable support services spanning education, health, and family reunification. The study finds that rehabilitative legal models, exemplified by countries such as Norway and Germany, correlate with lower recidivism rates and greater social participation. The research identifies coordinated multi-sectoral strategies as essential to promoting inclusive and effective reintegration. Such strategies advance public safety while upholding the human dignity and rights of formerly incarcerated individuals.
Authors
- Dalia Kadry Ahmed Abdelaziz (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7616-5827)
Institutions
- Prince Sultan University (SA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Social Sciences & Humanities Open
- Published
- 2026-09-21
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.103594
- Primary Topic
- Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00